Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable libunwind for rtems #682

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

thesummer
Copy link
Contributor

@thesummer thesummer commented Nov 24, 2024

In order to switch the RTEMS port to panic_unwind these changes need to be added in backtrace_rs.

Once this is merged and the submodule updated in rustc I will add another PR there to make the switch.

@thesummer thesummer mentioned this pull request Nov 24, 2024
@thesummer
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hm, it seems that the CI needs the changes from PR rust-lang/rust#130417 merged in order to use the ruzstd added in backtrace-rs previously. Any suggestions how to proceed? Do we wait until there is a solution to the issues discusses in rustc?

@workingjubilee workingjubilee merged commit 4d7906b into rust-lang:master Jan 3, 2025
41 checks passed
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2025
…ubilee

Switch rtems target to panic unwind

Switch the RTEMS target to `panic_unwind`.

Relates to rust-lang/backtrace-rs#682
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2025
…ubilee

Switch rtems target to panic unwind

Switch the RTEMS target to `panic_unwind`.

Relates to rust-lang/backtrace-rs#682
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#133420 - thesummer:rtems-unwind, r=workingjubilee

Switch rtems target to panic unwind

Switch the RTEMS target to `panic_unwind`.

Relates to rust-lang/backtrace-rs#682
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants