Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor fixes to Getting Started, plus reworking recommended inventory … #4955

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cielf
Copy link
Collaborator

@cielf cielf commented Jan 27, 2025

Description

Minor fixes to Getting Started, plus reworking recommended inventory start to using Audits.

Type of change

  • Documentation update

@cielf cielf requested a review from scooter-dangle January 27, 2025 19:29

- Do you (your bank) want to start out immediately with my partners making requests, or do you want to just track your distributions for awhile first?
- Do you run on a monthly cycle, or more on an adhoc basis?
- Do you (your bank) want to start out immediately with your partners making requests, or do you want to just track your distributions for awhile first?
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tiniest nit…I think it's a while when following a preposition and only awhile when used as an adverb.

Suggested change
- Do you (your bank) want to start out immediately with your partners making requests, or do you want to just track your distributions for awhile first?
- Do you (your bank) want to start out immediately with your partners making requests, or do you want to just track your distributions for a while first?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For a while looks weird to me though -- how about

Do you (your bank) want to start out immediately with your partners making requests, or do you want to just track your distributions awhile first?

@@ -11,9 +11,9 @@ READY FOR REVIEW

4/ The usual way to handle bringing on Partners to be able to make Requests is to invite them, then have them fill in their profile before approving them, so that you get the information from them that your bank needs for grants, etc. However, if that's not how you want to work, it is also possible to invite and approve them in one step.

5/ A lot of Banks set up a Partner as a proxy for their direct distribution to people in need. This is allowed, and you can switch back and forth between being a Bank and a Partner with the same login
5/ Many Banks set up a Partner as a proxy for their direct distribution to people in need. This is allowed, and you can switch back and forth between being a Bank and a Partner with the same login.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note on Markdown formatting…I don't think it recognizes 5/ as anything semantic. If you use a . instead of a /, I believe it then generates html with <li> list items inside an overall <ol> ordered list.

It should also auto-fix any numbering typos, although that could sometimes be more confusing than helpful.

E.g., the following markdown

1. First item
2. Second
2. Third

is formatted with correct numbering as

  1. First item
  2. Second
  3. Third

Copy link
Collaborator

@scooter-dangle scooter-dangle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall looks great. Feel free to accept / refuse the various nits as desired.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants