-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 146
chore(site): local inspector blog #3593
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
3 Skipped Deployments
|
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue. You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
More templates
@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers
@rivetkit/db
@rivetkit/framework-base
@rivetkit/next-js
@rivetkit/react
rivetkit
@rivetkit/sql-loader
@rivetkit/virtual-websocket
@rivetkit/engine-runner
@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol
commit: |
PR Review: Local Inspector Blog PostThis PR adds a blog post announcing the new Rivet Local Inspector. Overall, the content is well-written and engaging. Below are my findings: Issues Found1. Incorrect Frontmatter Format (Critical)Location: website/src/posts/2025-12-05-introducing-the-new-local-inspector/page.mdx:1-4 The frontmatter uses export statements instead of YAML frontmatter. Based on other blog posts in website/src/content/posts/, the correct format should use YAML frontmatter wrapped in --- delimiters. Current format uses TypeScript exports, but it should follow the YAML pattern like other posts. 2. Inconsistent Date Format (Major)Location: Filename and frontmatter The blog post is dated 2025-12-05 (December 5, 2025), but today is 2025-01-15 (January 15, 2025). This is a future date. Should this be:
Please verify the intended publication date. 3. Incomplete Sentence (Major)Location: page.mdx:12 The sentence "Today, we are launching the inspector button for the Rivet Local Inspector" is awkward. "Launching the inspector button" does not make sense. Should be something like:
4. Vague Placeholder (Minor)Location: page.mdx:12 The phrase "giving you X-ray vision into your application state" is a good metaphor but consider being more specific about what visibility the inspector provides. 5. Capitalization Inconsistency (Minor)Location: Throughout the document Following CLAUDE.md conventions, "Rivet Actor" should be capitalized as a proper noun when referring to the Rivet Actors feature specifically. The document correctly uses "Rivet Actors" in some places (lines 16, 26) but could be more consistent. Content QualityStrengths:
Suggestions:
Security and Best Practices✅ No security concerns (informational blog post only) Recommendations
Great work on documenting this feature! The writing is engaging and developer-focused. Once the frontmatter format and date issues are resolved, this will be ready to publish. |
0b0a57b to
4861f66
Compare
4861f66 to
81e5ebe
Compare
81e5ebe to
06d774c
Compare

No description provided.