Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix test failures in deploy_flask_app and backup_select_resources roles #112

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 26, 2024

Conversation

GomathiselviS
Copy link
Contributor

This PR fixes the integration test failures for the following roles

deploy_flask_app:
The Postgres DB engine version 14.8 has been removed and replaced with version 16.2.

backup_select_resources:
Incorrect mention of a dict attribute has been rectified with the right one

@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ To delete the webapp:
* **rds_instance_class** (str): DB instance class for the RDS instance. Default: `db.m6g.large`
* **rds_instance_name** (str): Name for the database. Default: `mysampledb123`
* **rds_engine** (str): Engine to use for the database. Default: `postgres`
* **rds_engine_version** (str): Version number of the database engine to use. Default: `"14.8"`
* **rds_engine_version** (str): Version number of the database engine to use. Default: `"16.2"`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this change a breaking_change?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I fail to see why this modification would constitute a breaking change. AWS has eliminated the 14.8 version. Users can still specify the desired version number as they did previously. If not specified, the default value will now be 16.2 instead of 14.8. This adjustment should have no impact on users of this role. Does this make sense to you?

@GomathiselviS GomathiselviS merged commit 5482e9e into redhat-cop:main Apr 26, 2024
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants