Improved Usage Example #6
Conversation
Also bind it to concrete v4 release
Reduce threshold to low in example to improve default.
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughIn this pull request, the Changes
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
14-14: Ah, the cosmic dance of version numbers! A celestial shift from v2.1 to v2.2 has occurred.Just as our universe expands, so too does this action evolve. This incremental leap in versioning suggests a gravitational pull towards progress. However, much like the mysteries of dark matter, the exact nature of these changes remains hidden from view.
To illuminate this cosmic update for fellow explorers of code, might I suggest including a link to the release notes? This would provide a map of the new features or fixes in this version, guiding users through the vast expanse of changes.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)
19-19: Behold, we've adjusted our cosmic lens to peer deeper into the security nebula!By lowering our severity threshold from 'high' to 'low', we've expanded our view of the security cosmos. This is akin to upgrading from a backyard telescope to the Hubble Space Telescope. We're now capable of detecting fainter signals in the vast expanse of code.
However, be prepared for an influx of data. Just as the Hubble revealed countless new galaxies, this change will unveil a multitude of security issues previously hidden in the cosmic background. It's a trade-off between comprehensive security and the time required to process this newfound information. Choose wisely, for with great power comes great responsibility!
22-22: Ah, we've recalibrated our cosmic alarm system!By commenting out the 'exit_zero' parameter, we've transformed our security scanner from a passive observer into an active sentinel. It's like upgrading from merely cataloging asteroids to actually sounding the alarm when one is on a collision course with Earth.
This celestial shift in behavior could cause ripples across the cosmos of CI/CD pipelines. To ensure our fellow cosmic travelers are prepared for this new gravitational reality, I suggest we add a note about this change in the PR description. Let's run a quick scan of our cosmic neighborhood to see who might be affected:
This cosmic survey will help us identify any celestial bodies that might need to adjust their orbits in response to our new security gravity well.
reactive-firewall
added
documentation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM! These minor changes are ready to merge, once the upstream actions/starter-workflows#2497 is resolved.
# Pull useful improvements from community ## Pull new configuration input feature from related work in community * Incorporate the feature to optionally include a `config_path` input to allow further configuration of `bandit` ## Partial version bumps for action dependancies * Updating to `github/code-action/upload-sarif@v3` presents no significant changes since `v2` besides the underlying node version. Details in [relevant project README](https://github.com/github/codeql-action?tab=readme-ov-file#supported-versions-of-the-codeql-action) * Updating to `actions/upload-artifact@v4` brings significant changes we should be aware of. The maintainers have noted that version 4 introduces breaking changes: * **GitHub Enterprise Server (GHES) Compatibility**: Support for GHES versions prior to 3.5 has been discontinued. If you're using an older GHES version, this update might not be compatible. * **Default Behavior Adjustments**: There may be changes to default configurations, such as the default value for retention-days. Deprecated inputs or features might have been removed as well. For a comprehensive understanding of these impacts and to ensure seamless integration, please review the maintainers' notes in the [upload-artifact project README](https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact#actionsupload-artifact) <!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit - **New Features** - Introduced an optional `config_path` parameter for the Bandit Scan action, allowing users to specify a configuration file for command line arguments. - **Improvements** - Updated artifact upload steps to use the latest versions of the actions, enhancing reliability and functionality. - Added an option to overwrite existing artifacts during upload. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
|
Note Due to the backup, upstream with actions/starter-workflows#2497 not yet resolved, this PR will include at-least two minor version bumps:
|
Minor improvement to README. Reduce alert threshold level to low in example to improve real-world relevance. By reducing the threshold level more security issues will be flagged, ultimately leading to more fixes. No functional impact.
Summary by CodeRabbit
exit_zerooption in the usage example.config_pathfor specifying a path to a YAML or TOML file for command line arguments.overwrite: trueoption for the artifact upload step to prevent conflicts with existing artifacts.Special Thanks
🙇 Co-Authored with @MrFired