Skip to content

Conversation

michaelklishin
Copy link
Collaborator

Namely, 'starting'.

Previously, a Prometheus scraping endpoint hit
just at the right moment (when a shovel was
in the 'starting' state) would produce
a function_clause exception.

Namely, 'starting'.

Previously, a Prometheus scraping endpoint hit
just at the right moment (when a shovel was
in the 'starting' state) would produce
a function_clause exception.
@michaelklishin michaelklishin merged commit 232d968 into main Sep 2, 2025
280 of 281 checks passed
@michaelklishin michaelklishin deleted the mk-rabbitmq-shovel-prometheus-should-handle-single-atom-shovel-states branch September 2, 2025 07:04
@michaelklishin michaelklishin added this to the 4.3.0 milestone Sep 2, 2025
@michaelklishin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Mergifyio backport v4.2.x

Copy link

mergify bot commented Sep 2, 2025

backport v4.2.x

❌ No backport have been created

  • Backport to branch v4.2.x failed

GitHub error: Branch not found

michaelklishin added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025
…-should-handle-single-atom-shovel-states

rabbitmq_shovel_prometheus: handle single atom shovel states

(cherry picked from commit 232d968)
@michaelklishin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Manually backported to v4.2.x.

michaelklishin added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2025
For 4.1.5: rabbitmq_shovel_prometheus: handle single atom shovel states (backport #14480)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant