Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to LangChain4j 0.36.2 #1097

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jmartisk
Copy link
Collaborator

@jmartisk jmartisk commented Nov 22, 2024

@jmartisk jmartisk requested a review from a team as a code owner November 22, 2024 10:01
@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
package io.quarkiverse.langchain4j.runtime.aiservice;

import static org.apache.commons.lang3.StringUtils.EMPTY;
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This dependency has somehow disappeared, but I don't see why we should re-add it just for a constant of an empty string

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Nov 22, 2024

Status for workflow Build (on pull request)

This is the status report for running Build (on pull request) on commit 3168cce.

✅ The latest workflow run for the pull request has completed successfully.

It should be safe to merge provided you have a look at the other checks in the summary.

@jmartisk jmartisk requested a review from geoand November 22, 2024 11:33
@@ -116,6 +118,12 @@ public MistralAiEmbeddingResponse embedding(MistralAiEmbeddingRequest request) {
return restApi.embedding(request, apiKey);
}

// TODO: we don't provide support for MistralAiModerationModel yet
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, users can instantiate it directly, but we don't have a declarative way via config properties for it yet. I plan to add that via #1095

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Gotcha, thanks

Copy link
Collaborator

@geoand geoand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great stuff @jmartisk!

@geoand geoand merged commit 2103f07 into quarkiverse:main Nov 22, 2024
61 checks passed
@jmartisk jmartisk deleted the lc4j-0.36.2 branch November 22, 2024 15:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update to LangChain4j 0.36
2 participants