Broaden documentation #95
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It's not really important that point be specifically inside the code block. Being "at" the code block is fine and makes it a bit easier to satisfy the condition.
jcs090218
approved these changes
Jul 4, 2025
Collaborator
|
Sounds reasonable! :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Based on the support that was requested in #45, I figured it might be helpful if the documentation didn't suggest hooking into JS modes that don't come pre-installed with Emacs.
Regarding JS modes, I figured this would also be a good time to clarify that Prettier (and thus this package) isn't limited to just JavaScript any more.
Almost-related is that I mentioned in the README how this package also works with Org. Even more tangential is that I realized the documentation for
prettier-js-prettify-code-blockcould be simplified if I made it properly check for the code block "at point," so I made that little update too.