skip destroy monitor when ignore_exporter is true

[Smityz]

when ignore_exporter: true is setting, tiup should skip destroying node exporter

[ti-chi-bot]

[REVIEW NOTIFICATION]

This pull request has not been approved.

To complete the pull request process, please ask the reviewers in the list to review by filling /cc @reviewer in the comment.
After your PR has acquired the required number of LGTMs, you can assign this pull request to the committer in the list by filling /assign @committer in the comment to help you merge this pull request.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Reviewer can indicate their review by submitting an approval review.
Reviewer can cancel approval by submitting a request changes review.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (600390f) 56.14% compared to head (7b297a0) 55.97%.
Report is 70 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head 7b297a0 differs from pull request most recent head e73a281. Consider uploading reports for the commit e73a281 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2197      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   56.14%   55.97%   -0.17%     
==========================================
  Files         320      320              
  Lines       33866    33866              
==========================================
- Hits        19014    18956      -58     
- Misses      12583    12641      +58     
  Partials     2269     2269              

Flag	Coverage Δ
cluster	44.83% <100.00%> (-0.18%)	⬇️
dm	25.69% <100.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
playground	15.73% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
tiup	15.88% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
unittest	22.66% <ø> (-<0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[nexustar]

I suggest to move this if to "instCount[inst.GetManageHost()]--".So it will have the same behave like deploy.(If there are two instant on one machine, only one has "nomonitor" config, tiup cluster will deyloy and destroy monitor on this machine)

[Smityz]

I suggest to move this if to "instCount[inst.GetManageHost()]--".So it will have the same behave like deploy.(If there are two instant on one machine, only one has "nomonitor" config, tiup cluster will deyloy and destroy monitor on this machine)

updated

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: srstack
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign kaaaaaaang for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

[LGTM Timeline notifier]

Timeline:

• 2023-08-13 13:26:53.89523038 +0000 UTC m=+464778.444246366: ☑️ agreed by srstack.
• 2023-08-13 13:27:13.742076099 +0000 UTC m=+464798.291092085: ✖️🔁 reset by srstack.

[ti-chi-bot]

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

[ti-chi-bot]

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.