-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
br/stream: allow pitr to create oversized indices #58433
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: hillium <[email protected]>
Hi @YuJuncen. Thanks for your PR. PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #58433 +/- ##
================================================
+ Coverage 73.5696% 73.6051% +0.0354%
================================================
Files 1681 1762 +81
Lines 463846 540204 +76358
================================================
+ Hits 341250 397618 +56368
- Misses 101779 118823 +17044
- Partials 20817 23763 +2946
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
…r-restore-indices
Signed-off-by: hillium <[email protected]>
|
1 similar comment
/test pull-br-integration-test |
@YuJuncen: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@YuJuncen: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@@ -1321,6 +1321,9 @@ func restoreStream( | |||
ctx, cancelFn := context.WithCancel(c) | |||
defer cancelFn() | |||
|
|||
restoreCfg := enableTiDBConfig() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
maybe let's put a comment here for what it's used for?
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Tristan1900 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@Tristan1900: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #58430
Problem Summary:
During restoring, the internal config of BR wasn't updated.
It may reject all indices longer than the default config (
3072
) though the target cluster modified this config.What changed and how does it work?
This updates the TiDB config of the BR internal TiDB instance during restoring incremental data.
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.