Skip to content

Conversation

@trojanc
Copy link

@trojanc trojanc commented Oct 25, 2025

Add support for pointers in get value.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @trojanc, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the feel package by introducing robust support for pointer values within the get value function. The primary goal is to ensure that when data is accessed from a context, any underlying pointer values are automatically dereferenced to provide the actual data, rather than the memory address. This change improves the usability and predictability of context data access, with careful consideration given to not alter the behavior of existing feel object pointers.

Highlights

  • Pointer Dereferencing in get value: The get value function now automatically dereferences pointer values, ensuring that the actual value pointed to is returned instead of the pointer itself. This improves consistency when accessing data within contexts.
  • New dereferencePtr Utility: A new internal utility function, dereferencePtr, has been added to handle the logic of recursively dereferencing pointers. It includes specific logic to avoid dereferencing internal feel object pointers (e.g., *Number, *FEELDate) to preserve their intended behavior.
  • Comprehensive Pointer Handling Tests: Extensive new test cases have been added in eval_test.go to validate the correct handling of pointer values within structs, including nested structs and pointers to structs, ensuring robust behavior for the get value function.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds support for dereferencing pointer values in the get value function, which is a valuable enhancement. The implementation uses reflection to handle pointers, with special care taken to not dereference internal FEEL types. The logic appears sound and is well-supported by a new suite of tests covering various scenarios with pointers and nested structs. I have one minor suggestion regarding a duplicated test case.

@trojanc trojanc force-pushed the pointer-support branch 2 times, most recently from ddbe22a to fb832e6 Compare October 25, 2025 15:00
@trojanc trojanc mentioned this pull request Oct 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant