Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split NeTEx docs into tutorial and profile information #6062

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: dev-2.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

leonardehrenfried
Copy link
Member

Summary

The documentation page on NeTEx is a few years old and configuration has changed a lot since it was written. It's also a little vague about which profiles are supported.

Therefore I have split up the documentation into two pages:

  • one for setting up a Norwegian OTP instance
  • one for information about the NeTEx profiles and our position on them

Documentation

✔️

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.79%. Comparing base (048a219) to head (be23c02).
Report is 36 commits behind head on dev-2.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             dev-2.x    #6062   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage      69.78%   69.79%           
- Complexity     17357    17358    +1     
==========================================
  Files           1962     1962           
  Lines          74359    74357    -2     
  Branches        7624     7623    -1     
==========================================
+ Hits           51894    51895    +1     
+ Misses         19821    19819    -2     
+ Partials        2644     2643    -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@leonardehrenfried
Copy link
Member Author

cc @rcavaliere

@leonardehrenfried
Copy link
Member Author

jtorin
jtorin previously approved these changes Sep 19, 2024
@leonardehrenfried
Copy link
Member Author

@jtorin I ended up fixing the typo before the merge.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants