Skip to content

Apply patches from subtensor#5

Open
l0r1s wants to merge 32 commits intopolkadot-stable2509-3-otffrom
polkadot-stable2509-3-otf-patches
Open

Apply patches from subtensor#5
l0r1s wants to merge 32 commits intopolkadot-stable2509-3-otffrom
polkadot-stable2509-3-otf-patches

Conversation

@l0r1s
Copy link

@l0r1s l0r1s commented Jan 26, 2026

This PR apply the patches from subtensor to the Polkadot SDK including:

  • pallet-proxy patch
  • pallet-utility patch
  • frame-support-procedural made public for use in linting crate, the crate has bit split into a frame-support-procedural-core lib crate with items made public and reused inside the frame-support-procedural macro crate
  • CheckNonce transaction extension

@l0r1s l0r1s force-pushed the polkadot-stable2509-3-otf-patches branch 2 times, most recently from e2e535a to e8c817e Compare January 27, 2026 22:44
@l0r1s l0r1s force-pushed the polkadot-stable2509-3-otf branch from 27a4116 to 734e0bf Compare January 27, 2026 22:47
@l0r1s l0r1s force-pushed the polkadot-stable2509-3-otf-patches branch from e8c817e to 311bd9b Compare January 27, 2026 22:48
@l0r1s l0r1s force-pushed the polkadot-stable2509-3-otf branch 2 times, most recently from a0e94a2 to e197212 Compare January 27, 2026 22:56
@l0r1s l0r1s force-pushed the polkadot-stable2509-3-otf-patches branch from 311bd9b to 0a0b575 Compare January 27, 2026 22:56
@l0r1s l0r1s force-pushed the polkadot-stable2509-3-otf branch 2 times, most recently from f3f973c to e447017 Compare January 27, 2026 23:12
@l0r1s l0r1s force-pushed the polkadot-stable2509-3-otf-patches branch from 0a0b575 to 5233af1 Compare January 27, 2026 23:13
@l0r1s l0r1s force-pushed the polkadot-stable2509-3-otf branch from e447017 to c2f9ebc Compare January 28, 2026 13:15
@l0r1s l0r1s force-pushed the polkadot-stable2509-3-otf-patches branch from 5233af1 to 08adea3 Compare January 28, 2026 13:17
@l0r1s l0r1s force-pushed the polkadot-stable2509-3-otf branch from c2f9ebc to 0f8676f Compare January 28, 2026 13:26
@l0r1s l0r1s requested a review from a team January 28, 2026 13:30
Copy link

@shamil-gadelshin shamil-gadelshin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we have consensus changes within this PR?

@l0r1s
Copy link
Author

l0r1s commented Feb 2, 2026

Why do we have consensus changes within this PR?

There are some changes because the find_pre_digest return type has been changed from Result<PreDigest, Error<B>> to Result<Option<PreDigest>, Error<B>> following hybrid node work and a bunch of crates don't compile or have failing tests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants