Skip to content

Conversation

@sosiouxme
Copy link
Member

Job runs like https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/aggregated-aws-ovn-upgrade-4.19-micro-fips-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1912361927552536576 show this aggregating the right job and getting historical comparisons (although with the AWS account issues lately the bar may be a bit low). Occasionally we even get a success (when we are lucky enough to have 6+ jobs get past install). 4.20 looks similar.

This change should reduce AWS account contention a bit by removing 10 aws job runs from every 4.19/4.20 payload.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Apr 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 18, 2025

@sosiouxme: This pull request references TRT-1776 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Job runs like https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/aggregated-aws-ovn-upgrade-4.19-micro-fips-release-openshift-release-analysis-aggregator/1912361927552536576 show this aggregating the right job and getting historical comparisons (although with the AWS account issues lately the bar may be a bit low). Occasionally we even get a success (when we are lucky enough to have 6+ jobs get past install). 4.20 looks similar.

This change should reduce AWS account contention a bit by removing 10 aws job runs from every 4.19/4.20 payload.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and neisw April 18, 2025 12:44
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the rehearsals-ack Signifies that rehearsal jobs have been acknowledged label Apr 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[REHEARSALNOTIFIER]
@sosiouxme: no rehearsable tests are affected by this change

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 18, 2025

@sosiouxme: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 18, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 18, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sosiouxme, stbenjam

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit f886407 into openshift:master Apr 18, 2025
8 checks passed
@sosiouxme sosiouxme deleted the 20250403-TRT-1776-fips-aggregate branch April 18, 2025 13:26
sosiouxme added a commit to sosiouxme/origin-release that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2025
This was my blunder in openshift#64042 -
the intention was to replace the aws job, not the azure one.
openshift-merge-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2025
This was my blunder in #64042 -
the intention was to replace the aws job, not the azure one.
jinyunma pushed a commit to jinyunma/release that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2025
jinyunma pushed a commit to jinyunma/release that referenced this pull request Apr 27, 2025
This was my blunder in openshift#64042 -
the intention was to replace the aws job, not the azure one.
ctartici pushed a commit to ctartici/release_ctartici that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2025
ctartici pushed a commit to ctartici/release_ctartici that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2025
This was my blunder in openshift#64042 -
the intention was to replace the aws job, not the azure one.
mehabhalodiya pushed a commit to mehabhalodiya/release that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2025
mehabhalodiya pushed a commit to mehabhalodiya/release that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2025
This was my blunder in openshift#64042 -
the intention was to replace the aws job, not the azure one.
Neilhamza pushed a commit to Neilhamza/release that referenced this pull request May 5, 2025
This was my blunder in openshift#64042 -
the intention was to replace the aws job, not the azure one.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. rehearsals-ack Signifies that rehearsal jobs have been acknowledged

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants