Support path alias for webpack and babel

[ruanyl]

Description

This PR add path alias support for webpack and babel. Previously, path alias only works for importing typescript types.

1. webpack now supports opensearch-dashboards/public path alias
2. Refactor the current in-house path resolution in BundleRefsPlugin to use webpack internal compiler.resolverFactory to work with webpack path alias
3. Introduced babel-plugin-module-resolver to enable path alias support for babel so that we can use path alias in server side code and jest tests.

Examples:

For public code

// before
import { formatUrlWithWorkspaceId } from '../../../../../src/core/public/utils';
// after
import { formatUrlWithWorkspaceId } from 'opensearch-dashboards/public/utils';

For server code

// before
import { fromRoot } from '../../../core/server/utils';
// after
import { fromRoot } from 'opensearch-dashboards/server/utils';

For jest tests:

// before
import { applicationServiceMock } from '../../../src/core/public/mocks';
// after
import { applicationServiceMock } from 'opensearch-dashboards/public/mocks'

Issues Resolved

#9184

Screenshot

Testing the changes

Changelog

• infra: add path alias support for webpack and babel

Check List

• All tests pass
  • yarn test:jest
  • yarn test:jest_integration
• New functionality includes testing.
• New functionality has been documented.
• Update CHANGELOG.md
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 61.05%. Comparing base (15a19fa) to head (f3fc1df).
Report is 24 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9205      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   60.93%   61.05%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files        3809     3816       +7     
  Lines       91270    91493     +223     
  Branches    14414    14459      +45     
==========================================
+ Hits        55618    55858     +240     
+ Misses      32097    32070      -27     
- Partials     3555     3565      +10     

Flag	Coverage Δ
Linux_1	29.12% <100.00%> (+0.15%)	⬆️
Linux_2	56.45% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Linux_3	38.03% <ø> (?)
Linux_4	29.08% <ø> (+0.04%)	⬆️
Windows_1	29.14% <100.00%> (+0.15%)	⬆️
Windows_2	56.40% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
Windows_3	38.03% <ø> (+0.06%)	⬆️
Windows_4	29.08% <ø> (+0.04%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Hailong-am]

can we have some existing code updated to new format? so that we can verify it works during build and also take it as example.

[d-buckner]

Really nice QoL improvement!

[d-buckner]

Do we want to silently fail here for all resolver errors? I'm not sure how this is handled upstream, but it may simplify build issue debugging if we reject with error so we don't swallow it.