-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 168
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8261: Use test flag to skip JDP multicast tests in JolokiaTest #588
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
8261: Use test flag to skip JDP multicast tests in JolokiaTest #588
Conversation
👋 Welcome back skarsaune! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@skarsaune This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@thegreystone) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
@skarsaune Here's a jira issue you can use for this PR, and then Skara should pick it up and run the CI. It looks like after the change to use the setup-maven action in the workflow (link) we cannot run CI in our forks. For example, the action that tried to run on your fork here shows an error: |
Webrevs
|
@aptmac : even after referencing the issue. it still does not appear to run the ci tests on the pr. Any way to trigger it? As the pr is speculative, it does not make sense to merge it before we have tested it. |
I'm not sure what's happening here, will have to take a look at why the rest of the checks haven't triggered. |
I took a bit more of a look around some of our forks, and I'm not seeing the issue I posted in the comment above: #588 (comment). I'm curious what happens if you manually trigger a workflow on the master branch at: https://github.com/skarsaune/jmc/actions I'm wondering if it's a mis-configuration of the workflow actions in your fork somehow. |
@skarsaune This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
I took this branch and ran the actions on my own fork, there's a style issue that needs to be fixed by running https://github.com/aptmac/jmc/actions/runs/11522768181/job/32079324937#step:9:16964 |
Thanks. Mac OS was the particular case that fails. It may be something else then. As I have no simple way to reproduce the pipeline behaviour I suggest we abandon this one. Bigger fish to fry. |
…o_avoid_jolokia_discovery
Hmm, since there seems to be problems with multicast on Mac OS in the pipeline, I assumed that the flag to avoid JDP multicast tests was set in the pipeline, but I assume that that is not the case 🤔 |
I just became aware that there is a new flag used to skip JDP tests.
I previously added some env checking to skip similar multicast tests for Jolokia.
Hence it would be a lot cleaner to use the new standardized mechanism for this.
Trying out whether this fixes JMC-8261
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jmc.git pull/588/head:pull/588
$ git checkout pull/588
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/588
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jmc.git pull/588/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 588
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 588
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jmc/pull/588.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment