Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor functional coverage #1256

Merged
merged 21 commits into from
Feb 13, 2025

Conversation

jordancarlin
Copy link
Member

@jordancarlin jordancarlin commented Jan 30, 2025

  • Updates to testbench, simulation scripts, and config files for compatibility with the overhauled functional coverage in cvw-arch-verif.
  • Functional coverage and lockstep are now two discrete flags for wsim.

@jordancarlin jordancarlin changed the title Separate lockstep and functional coverage Refactor functional coverage Feb 6, 2025
@jordancarlin jordancarlin marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2025 10:47
@jordancarlin
Copy link
Member Author

This should finally be ready to go! The one thing we still need to decide is if we want regression-wally --fcov to just run functional coverage or to run functional coverage and lockstep simultaneously. wsim will definitely have separate flags, but we could go either way for regression-wally.

@davidharrishmc
Copy link
Contributor

I think --fcov should do functional coverage and lockstep, because that's the use case we generally care about at this point.

@davidharrishmc davidharrishmc merged commit 8f7a323 into openhwgroup:main Feb 13, 2025
3 checks passed
@jordancarlin jordancarlin deleted the fcov_lockstep branch February 16, 2025 03:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants