Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feat: add docs for java batch check #951

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025
Merged

feat: add docs for java batch check #951

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025
+59 −49

Conversation

jimmyjames
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Adds example code for calling the updated batchCheck method in Java.

References

Review Checklist

  • I have clicked on "allow edits by maintainers".
  • I have added documentation for new/changed functionality in this PR or in a PR to openfga.dev [Provide a link to any relevant PRs in the references section above]
  • The correct base branch is being used, if not main
  • I have added tests to validate that the change in functionality is working as expected

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2025 •
edited
Loading

PR Preview Action v1.4.8
Preview removed because the pull request was closed.
2025-02-07 19:52 UTC

@jimmyjames jimmyjames marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2025 18:10
@jimmyjames jimmyjames requested review from a team as code owners February 7, 2025 18:10
@jimmyjames jimmyjames requested a review from rhamzeh February 7, 2025 19:30
@jimmyjames jimmyjames merged commit 109950f into main Feb 7, 2025
12 checks passed
@jimmyjames jimmyjames deleted the feat/batch-check-java branch February 7, 2025 19:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@rhamzeh rhamzeh rhamzeh approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@jimmyjames @rhamzeh