Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated odh-elyra from 4.0.3 to 4.1.1 #746

Conversation

paulovmr
Copy link
Contributor

@paulovmr paulovmr commented Oct 14, 2024

Description

Updated odh-elyra from 4.0.3 to 4.1.1

How Has This Been Tested?

Merge criteria:

  • The commits are squashed in a cohesive manner and have meaningful messages.
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from atheo89 and dibryant October 14, 2024 15:41
@paulovmr paulovmr requested a review from caponetto October 14, 2024 15:41
@caponetto
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Oct 14, 2024
@paulovmr paulovmr force-pushed the update-version-odh-elyra-4.1.0 branch from b401891 to d9ebc76 Compare October 14, 2024 22:35
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Oct 14, 2024
@paulovmr paulovmr changed the title Updated odh-elyra from 4.0.3 to 4.1.0 Updated odh-elyra from 4.0.3 to 4.1.1 Oct 14, 2024
@paulovmr
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@atheo89
Copy link
Member

atheo89 commented Oct 15, 2024

/retest

@jiridanek
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
let's send it to rhoai-nightly asap

@caponetto
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@paulovmr paulovmr force-pushed the update-version-odh-elyra-4.1.0 branch from d9ebc76 to db24a9e Compare October 15, 2024 12:55
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Oct 15, 2024
@caponetto
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Oct 15, 2024
@paulovmr
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

3 similar comments
@paulovmr
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@paulovmr
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@paulovmr
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@paulovmr
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

/override ci/prow/rocm-notebooks-e2e-tests
/override ci/prow/notebooks-ubi9-e2e-tests
/override ci/prow/notebook-rocm-jupyter-tf-ubi9-python-3-11-pr-image-mirror
/override ci/prow/notebook-rocm-jupyter-pyt-ubi9-python-3-11-pr-image-mirror
/override ci/prow/images

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: paulovmr

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2024

@paulovmr: Overrode contexts on behalf of paulovmr: ci/prow/images, ci/prow/notebook-rocm-jupyter-pyt-ubi9-python-3-11-pr-image-mirror, ci/prow/notebook-rocm-jupyter-tf-ubi9-python-3-11-pr-image-mirror, ci/prow/notebooks-ubi9-e2e-tests, ci/prow/rocm-notebooks-e2e-tests

In response to this:

/approve

/override ci/prow/rocm-notebooks-e2e-tests
/override ci/prow/notebooks-ubi9-e2e-tests
/override ci/prow/notebook-rocm-jupyter-tf-ubi9-python-3-11-pr-image-mirror
/override ci/prow/notebook-rocm-jupyter-pyt-ubi9-python-3-11-pr-image-mirror
/override ci/prow/images

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit eb80da3 into opendatahub-io:main Oct 16, 2024
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants