Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NO-JIRA: chore(gha): pin github runner to ubuntu-22.04 to avoid flaky failures in podman #745

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

jiridanek
Copy link
Member

@jiridanek jiridanek commented Oct 14, 2024

On main, we are having a failure https://github.com/opendatahub-io/notebooks/actions/runs/11330148742

mount: /home/runner/.local/share/containers: mount point does not exist.
       dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.
Error: Process completed with exit code 32.

and then I sometimes see in strace -f

[pid  2790] write(2, "time=\"2024-10-14T15:41:51Z\" level=error msg=\"running `/usr/bin/newuidmap 2798 0 1001 1 1 165536 65536`: newuidmap: write to uid_map failed: Operation not permitted\\n\"\n", 167 <unfinished ...>
[pid  2795] futex(0xc00007dd48, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 0, NULLtime="2024-10-14T15:41:51Z" level=error msg="running `/usr/bin/newuidmap 2798 0 1001 1 1 165536 65536`: newuidmap: write to uid_map failed: Operation not permitted\n"

Here's the GHA running on my fork before, notice that some builds fail and some pass, seemingly at random https://github.com/jiridanek/notebooks/actions/runs/11331224673

Here's a run with older ubuntu runner, everything passes https://github.com/jiridanek/notebooks/actions/runs/11331346965

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from caponetto and paulovmr October 14, 2024 15:09
@jiridanek
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @jstourac

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from jstourac October 14, 2024 15:09
@jiridanek jiridanek marked this pull request as draft October 14, 2024 15:20
@jiridanek jiridanek changed the title NO-JIRA: fix(gha): ensure that build_mont_path exists even if podman is not initialized yet NO-JIRA: chore(gha): pin github runner to ubuntu-22.04 to avoid flaky failures in podman Oct 14, 2024
@jiridanek jiridanek changed the title NO-JIRA: chore(gha): pin github runner to ubuntu-22.04 to avoid flaky failures in podman NO-JIRA: chore(gha): pin github runner to ubuntu-22.04 to avoid flaky failures in podman; remove workaround no longer needed Oct 14, 2024
@jiridanek jiridanek changed the title NO-JIRA: chore(gha): pin github runner to ubuntu-22.04 to avoid flaky failures in podman; remove workaround no longer needed NO-JIRA: chore(gha): pin github runner to ubuntu-22.04 to avoid flaky failures in podman Oct 14, 2024
@jiridanek jiridanek marked this pull request as ready for review October 14, 2024 16:26
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from atheo89 and dibryant October 14, 2024 16:26
@caponetto
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@paulovmr
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@atheo89
Copy link
Member

atheo89 commented Oct 15, 2024

/override ci/prow/images

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 15, 2024

@atheo89: Overrode contexts on behalf of atheo89: ci/prow/images

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/images

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit d07426e into opendatahub-io:main Oct 15, 2024
7 checks passed
@jiridanek jiridanek deleted the poetry_venv branch October 15, 2024 07:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants