-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
multicellular organism disjoint from organism substance #2421 #3151
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fix unsats.
The obvious problem in Uberon is here:
With “channel for” being range-restricted to “organism substances”, it is obviously a mistake to say the vaginal canal is a “channel for” the embryo. Either the range restriction on that relation should be relaxed if the intention is for it to be used for more than just substances, or the relationship between “median vaginal canal” and “embryo” should either be dropped or replaced by a more suitable relation. |
But I am puzzled by the other unsats, which don’t seem to have anything to do with Uberon at all. |
I can’t reproduce the other unsats locally. The only unsats I get running the test suite locally are the ones caused by median vaginal canal as explained above. |
This PR has not seen any activity in the past month; if nobody comments or reviews it in the next week, the PR creator will be allowed to proceed with merging without explicit approval, should they wish to do so. |
The NCBITaxon unsats likely due to superimposition of 2 versions of NCBITaxon (this is one of the key motivations for base files). Difference between local and actions may be due to difference in versions on the network and/or triggering rebuilds of mirrors (but I defer to the Damien with an E who knows ODK better than me) As for channeling embryos, rococo/vanity axiom, remove it |
@ddooley Can you remove the “median vaginal canal SubClassOf channel for some embryo“ axiom in Uberon? It makes sense that this should be done as part of this PR, since the incorrectness of this axiom was revealed by the addition of your disjointness axiom between “multicellular organism“ and “organic substance“. I would also suggest that said disjointness axiom should be added to the main Uberon source file ( |
This PR has not seen any activity in the past month; if nobody comments or reviews it in the next week, the PR creator will be allowed to proceed with merging without explicit approval, should they wish to do so. |
Addresses Issue #2421 . This is in external disjoints file though the two terms are native to Uberon though.