Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(Table): enhancement function comparator #2413

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rdjanuar
Copy link
Contributor

πŸ”— Linked issue

❓ Type of change

  • πŸ“– Documentation (updates to the documentation or readme)
  • 🐞 Bug fix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • πŸ‘Œ Enhancement (improving an existing functionality)
  • ✨ New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • 🧹 Chore (updates to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries)
  • ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

πŸ“š Description

Hi, I just added a small function called accessor that allows accessing an object using the dot notation. It will be used in a comparison function so that users can compare nested objects. For example:

<script setup lang="ts">
const people = [{
  id: 1,
  name: 'Lindsay Walton',
  title: 'Front-end Developer',
  email: '[email protected]',
  role: 'Member',
  customer: {
    id: '1'
  }
]

const selected = ref([people[0])
</script>

<template>
  <UTable v-model="selected" :rows="people" by="customer.id" />
</template>

πŸ“ Checklist

  • I have linked an issue or discussion.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@rdjanuar rdjanuar changed the title Feat(Table): enhancement function comparator feat(Table): enhancement function comparator Oct 18, 2024
@rdjanuar rdjanuar changed the title feat(Table): enhancement function comparator feat(Table): enhancement function 'comparator' Oct 18, 2024
@rdjanuar rdjanuar changed the title feat(Table): enhancement function 'comparator' feat(Table): enhancement function comparator Oct 18, 2024
@rdjanuar
Copy link
Contributor Author

i think i can extend function get in utils

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant