Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: patch TransformStream on Node.js 16 #564

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

fix: patch TransformStream on Node.js 16 #564

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

fengmk2
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Dec 11, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced compatibility with Node.js 16 by adding support for TransformStream.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Implemented a polyfill for TransformStream to ensure it is available in the global scope if not already defined.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve the addition of the TransformStream import from node:stream/web to the src/utils.ts file. The patchForNode16 function is updated to check for the existence of global.TransformStream, adding a polyfill if it is not defined. This update aims to enhance compatibility with Node.js 16 without altering existing function signatures or overall control flow.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/utils.ts Added import for TransformStream from node:stream/web and updated patchForNode16 to check for global.TransformStream.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: support use on Node.js 16 #550: This PR modifies src/utils.ts to enhance compatibility with Node.js 16, similar to the main PR's addition of TransformStream and the patchForNode16 function, indicating a direct relationship in their objectives to support Node.js 16 features.

Poem

In the code where streams do flow,
A new transform joins the show.
With checks in place, it finds its home,
In Node 16, it loves to roam.
So let us cheer, with hops and glee,
For streams that dance so joyfully! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Open in Stackblitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/node-modules/urllib@564

commit: ef8bc3a

if (typeof global.TransformStream === 'undefined') {
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
// @ts-ignore
global.TransformStream = TransformStream;
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.82%. Comparing base (6f9f353) to head (ef8bc3a).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #564      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.79%   95.82%   +1.03%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        1267     1270       +3     
  Branches      305      307       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         1201     1217      +16     
+ Misses         62       49      -13     
  Partials        4        4              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/utils.ts (1)

219-223: Consider adding tests for the TransformStream polyfill

The new polyfill functionality should be covered by tests to ensure it works correctly across different Node.js versions.

Would you like me to help create test cases for verifying the TransformStream polyfill functionality?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b5dccce and ef8bc3a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/utils.ts (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/utils.ts (2)

4-4: LGTM: Import statement follows Node.js best practices

The addition of TransformStream to the import statement is correct and follows Node.js best practices by using the node: protocol prefix.


219-223: Verify the TransformStream polyfill compatibility

The implementation follows the established pattern for Web Streams API polyfills. However, we should verify:

  1. The polyfill works correctly on Node.js 16
  2. This change doesn't affect other Node.js versions unexpectedly

Let's verify the Node.js version compatibility:

@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit 503dbd8 into master Dec 11, 2024
27 checks passed
@fengmk2 fengmk2 deleted the fix-node16 branch December 11, 2024 14:06
fengmk2 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2024
[skip ci]

## [4.6.8](v4.6.7...v4.6.8) (2024-12-11)

### Bug Fixes

* patch TransformStream on Node.js 16 ([#564](#564)) ([503dbd8](503dbd8))
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant