Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: run Node.js 16 tests case #551

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2024
Merged

test: run Node.js 16 tests case #551

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 2, 2024

Conversation

fengmk2
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 fengmk2 commented Dec 2, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new GitHub Actions workflow for automated continuous integration in a Node.js 16 environment.
    • Added a new testing script for Node.js 16 to enhance testing capabilities.
  • Chores

    • Updated package.json to include the new "test-node16" script for executing example Node.js scripts.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Walkthrough

A new GitHub Actions workflow file named nodejs-16.yml has been added to automate continuous integration for a Node.js 16 environment. This workflow is triggered on pushes and pull requests to the master branch and includes a job that builds and tests the application. Additionally, the package.json file has been updated to include a new script, "test-node16", which runs multiple Node.js scripts to enhance testing capabilities for Node.js version 16.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/nodejs-16.yml Added a new workflow for Node.js 16 CI, defining a build job with steps for checkout, setup, install, and test.
package.json Introduced a new script "test-node16" to run three Node.js scripts for testing in Node.js 16.

Possibly related PRs

🐇 In the meadow, under the sun,
A new workflow's just begun!
With Node.js 16, we hop and play,
Testing scripts in a joyful way.
So let’s build and test with glee,
For every rabbit, it’s a jubilee! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Open in Stackblitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/node-modules/urllib@551

commit: d4080b2

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.50%. Comparing base (78e1336) to head (d4080b2).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #551   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.50%   93.50%           
=======================================
  Files          10       10           
  Lines        1277     1277           
  Branches      289      289           
=======================================
  Hits         1194     1194           
  Misses         79       79           
  Partials        4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/nodejs-16.yml (2)

20-22: Add caching for better workflow performance

Consider adding npm cache to speed up the workflow:

      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: '16.x'
+         cache: 'npm'
      - run: npm install
      - run: npm run prepublishOnly

23-23: Fix trailing whitespace

There's a trailing space at the end of line 23.

-      - run: npm run test-node16 
+      - run: npm run test-node16
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 23-23: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eba0c51 and d4080b2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/nodejs-16.yml (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/nodejs-16.yml

[error] 23-23: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
"test-tsc:esm": "cd test/fixtures/ts-esm && rm -rf node_modules && npm link ../../.. && npm run build",
"test": "npm run lint && vitest run",
"test-keepalive": "cross-env TEST_KEEPALIVE_COUNT=50 vitest run --test-timeout 180000 keep-alive-header.test.ts",
"test-node16": "node examples/httpclient.cjs && node examples/search_github.cjs && node examples/timing.cjs",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove test-node16 script as it's incompatible with package requirements

The test-node16 script should be removed because:

  1. The package explicitly requires Node.js >= 18.19.0 in its engines field
  2. After examining the example files, they use standard Node.js features and don't contain any Node.js 16-specific code that would justify maintaining backwards compatibility tests
  3. Running these tests on Node.js 16 could provide false confidence since the package is not designed to support that version
🔗 Analysis chain

Version compatibility concern

The package.json specifies "node": ">= 18.19.0" in the engines field, but we're adding tests for Node.js 16. This might lead to compatibility issues or misleading test results.

Let's verify if the example files exist and check their Node.js version compatibility:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the example files exist and look for any version-specific code
echo "Checking example files existence and content:"
for file in examples/httpclient.cjs examples/search_github.cjs examples/timing.cjs; do
  if [ -f "$file" ]; then
    echo "Found $file"
    # Look for potential version-specific features
    rg -i "node:|requires|version" "$file"
  else
    echo "Missing $file"
  fi
done

Length of output: 840


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the content of these files to check for Node.js version-specific features
echo "=== httpclient.cjs ==="
cat examples/httpclient.cjs

echo -e "\n=== search_github.cjs ==="
cat examples/search_github.cjs

echo -e "\n=== timing.cjs ==="
cat examples/timing.cjs

# Also check package.json for any version-related context
echo -e "\n=== package.json engines and scripts ==="
cat package.json | rg -A 5 '"(engines|scripts)":'

Length of output: 3177

Comment on lines +1 to +23
name: Node.js 16 CI

on:
push:
branches: [ master ]
pull_request:
branches: [ master ]

jobs:
build:

runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Use Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: '16.x'
- run: npm install
- run: npm run prepublishOnly
- run: node -v
- run: npm run test-node16
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding error handling for the test script

The workflow should handle potential failures in individual example files:

name: Node.js 16 CI

on:
  push:
    branches: [ master ]
  pull_request:
    branches: [ master ]

jobs:
  build:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - name: Use Node.js
        uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: '16.x'
+         cache: 'npm'
      - run: npm install
      - run: npm run prepublishOnly
      - run: node -v
-      - run: npm run test-node16
+      - name: Run Node.js 16 tests
+        run: |
+          set -e
+          for example in httpclient.cjs search_github.cjs timing.cjs; do
+            echo "Running $example..."
+            node "examples/$example"
+          done

This change:

  1. Adds better error handling with set -e
  2. Provides clearer output for each example
  3. Makes it easier to identify which example failed

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 23-23: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

with:
node-version: '16.x'
- run: npm install
- run: npm run prepublishOnly
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Node.js 16 is not compatible with this package

The package explicitly requires Node.js >= 18.19.0 in its package.json engines field. Additionally, the build script uses Node.js 18+ features like node:fs/promises and node:path imports. Running the build in Node.js 16 environment will fail.

  • Remove the Node.js 16 workflow or update it to use Node.js 18+
  • The minimum Node.js version requirement is clearly stated in package.json: "node": ">= 18.19.0"
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify build compatibility with Node.js 16

The prepublishOnly script runs the build process which might use Node.js 18+ features. This could cause the workflow to fail.

Let's check the build scripts for version-specific features:


Let me check the content of the script and package.json to better understand the build requirements.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check build-related files for potential Node.js 18+ features
echo "Checking build scripts:"
rg -l "node:|requires|version" scripts/ 

Length of output: 132


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the script and package.json
echo "Content of scripts/replace_urllib_version.js:"
cat scripts/replace_urllib_version.js

echo -e "\nChecking package.json for engine requirements and build scripts:"
cat package.json | jq '{engines, scripts}'

Length of output: 2883

@fengmk2 fengmk2 merged commit 104664d into master Dec 2, 2024
24 checks passed
@fengmk2 fengmk2 deleted the nodejs-16-ci branch December 2, 2024 09:52
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant