feat: add rokt preparitive iframe #5
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
We have recently conducted performance tests with mParticle and the different environments: Performance Test Results
As you’ll see, there’s a bit more latency when loading Rokt through the mParticle kit. My understanding is that the page first has to load the mParticle Web SDK, which then injects the Rokt script. The extra steps in mParticle’s initialization plus loading Rokt Wsdk through kit leads to additional overhead. This explains why we’re seeing:
~50ms more in TTI compared to directly loading the Rokt WSDK
~200ms more in TTI when it’s Rokt WSDK “preloaded”
Testing Plan
This is a proof of concept draft PR that I wanted to run by with @alexs-mparticle and @rmi22186 and see how we can improve performance when loading Rokt Wsdk through mparticle kit