-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 179
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update junit.py #3496
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update junit.py #3496
Conversation
Added 3 new parameters include_passed_messages: ( Bool ) Include message and stacktrace in Junit XML output include_failed_messages: ( Bool ) Include message and stacktrace in Junit XML output include_skipped_messages: ( Bool ) Include message and stacktrace in Junit XML output Enhancements : Stacktrace now exists as an XML subproperty, making XML much cleaner. If "message" and "stacktrace" properties are empty in the TestResultMessage object, its relevant subXML objects will not be added, makes XML parsing cleaner. how to call ? Example code from runbook notifier: - type: html - type: env_stats - type: junit name: junit.lisa.xml include_subtest: true include_passed_messages: false include_failed_messages: true include_skipped_messages: true
lisa/notifiers/junit.py
Outdated
# show passed case 'message' and 'stacktraces' | ||
include_passed_messages: bool = False | ||
# show 'message' for failed cases and 'stacktrace' | ||
include_failed_messages: bool = True |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When should it be set to False? If no scenario, it can be included always.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Default behavior is to include messages and stacktraces for Failed tests/subcases.
Ideally we want messages for skipped tests.
Passed tests/cases should be optional and extension can bundle additional information in stacktrace
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see the scenarios, which want set failed/skippped to false, and set passed to true. So the three flags are not needed. The logic always include stackstrace for failed and skipped, but never for passed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
understood. I will modify code to only implement logic for successful test cases.
@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ class JUnitSchema(schema.Notifier): | |||
path: str = "lisa.junit.xml" | |||
# respect the original behavior, include subtest by default | |||
include_subtest: bool = True | |||
# show passed case 'message' and 'stacktraces' | |||
include_passed_messages: bool = False |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It doesn't need to be False by default, so the logic is more consistent for different types.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I marked it false to ensure current output is not modified in any way. This is because i expect users to be parsing this output in their implementation of LISA.
Marking passed and skipped flag as false by default allows us to maintain some level of compat with existing implementation while allowing customization for new implementations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If no scenario needs the stack trace for passed test cases, it doesn't need the flag.
Context : for cases such as XFSTest, iPerf and others where each test case will have multiple nested cases controlled directly by the tool being called, we needed a way to cleanly pass subtests with messages, stacks and other information to Junit XML for parsing and possible injection into databases,
Added 3 new parameters.
include_passed_messages: ( Bool ) Include message and stacktrace in Junit XML output. Defaults to False
include_failed_messages: ( Bool ) Include message and stacktrace in Junit XML output. Defaults to True
include_skipped_messages: ( Bool ) Include message and stacktrace in Junit XML output. Defaults to True
Enhancements : Stacktrace now exists as an XML subproperty, making XML much cleaner.
If "message" and "stacktrace" properties are empty in the TestResultMessage object, its relevant subXML objects will not be added, makes XML parsing & viewing cleaner.
note: Ideally this change should not break existing Junit parsing scripts, but its expected that end users are using properly traversing XML tree to ensure they do not end up with an exeception when say..."message" attribute is missing because there was actually no message passed by the TestResultMessage object.
how to call ? Example code from runbook--
notifier:
name: junit.lisa.xml
include_subtest: true
include_passed_messages: false
include_failed_messages: true
include_skipped_messages: true