using protocols for message handler decorated functions #4046
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Mohammad Mazraeh <[email protected]>
MohMaz
changed the title
MohMaz
commented
Nov 3, 2024
| @@ -47,13 +47,19 @@ class MessageHandler(Protocol[AgentT, ReceivesT, ProducesT]): # type: ignore | |||
| async def __call__(agent_instance: AgentT, message: ReceivesT, ctx: MessageContext) -> ProducesT: ... | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| # NOTE: this works on concrete types and not inheritance | |||
| # TODO: Use a protocol for the outer function to check checked arg names | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@jackgerrits @ekzhu I addressed this TODO but we're still facing same issue. Any guidance you might be able to provide?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why are these changes needed?
Addressing a To Do item that thought might help solving #3839 but still facing same issue.
Related issue number
Checks