Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Scripting: Fix Lua 5.1/LuaJIT and Lua 5.2 problems #3376
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Scripting: Fix Lua 5.1/LuaJIT and Lua 5.2 problems #3376
Changes from all commits
c552a96
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does LuaJIT actually provide a
lua51
soname? That seems weird...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. That is an inconsistency.
I'm using a win64 docker and MinGW's LuaJIT has same library names as standard Lua 5.1. In unix that's not true, names would be something like luajit51, luajit5.1...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, if that's the standard soname that's getting shipped for the package in MSYS2, then I guess it should stay as it is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, I've added luajit51 variants in order to be able to build using unix systems. I don't know if I should left the luajit${LUAJIT_VERSION_MAJOR}${LUAJIT_VERSION_MINOR} variants into the list. I've found LuaJIT installations where the library was named something like libluajit2.1.so or something like that, but I supose those name conventions are customized. Should I remove ${LUAJIT_VERSION_MAJOR}${LUAJIT_VERSION_MINOR} variants from the list leaving only luajit51 and lua51 ones, or it's alrhigt like it is now? Currently possibly library names list has 12 items...