Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Intuitionize section "Group multiple operation" #4498

Open
wants to merge 48 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jkingdon
Copy link
Contributor

This section intuitionizes without much trouble.

This is the syntax and df-mulg .  Copied without change from set.mm.
This is mulgfval from set.mm with a set existence condition added.
The proof is adapted from the mulgfvalALT proof in set.mm and needs some
intuitionizing related to the set existence condition.
This matches a statement already made in the comment about axiom usage.
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof needs a lot of intuitionizing but is
able to follow roughly the outlines of the set.mm proof.
This is mulgfn from set.mm with an additional set existence condition.
The proof is largely taken from the iset.mm proof of mulgval .
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof needs some intuitionizing but is
basically the set.mm proof.
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof needs some intuitionizing but is
basically the set.mm proof.
Stated as in set.mm.  The proof needs some intuitionizing but is
basically the set.mm proof.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant