Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix a typo #152

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2023
Merged

Fix a typo #152

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion tex/chProofLanguage.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ \chapter{A proof language for formal proofs}{}
please the formality requirements of Coq. A paradigmatic bookkeeping
example is destructing assumption of \C{(A && B)} in order to give
distinct names to \C{A} and \C{B}: unlikely to be a pregnant step of
the proof. The language of intro-patterns together with then
the proof. The language of intro-patterns together with the
goal-as-stack model provides a very flexible tool to
succinctly deal with bookkeeping.

Expand Down
Loading