Skip to content

Conversation

@ndrewh
Copy link
Contributor

@ndrewh ndrewh commented Jan 15, 2026

This is to work around an issue where sanitized libLTO cannot be loaded into LD.

We probably should have been bootstrapping anyway so that libLTO is sanitized with latest sanitizer runtimes.

rdar://164487647

@ndrewh
Copy link
Contributor Author

ndrewh commented Jan 15, 2026

It's still building locally, I'll merge this to give it a try later if my local build passes.

This is to work around an issue where sanitized libLTO cannot be
loaded into LD.

We probably should have been bootstrapping anyway to test with
latest sanitizer runtimes.

rdar://164487647
@ndrewh ndrewh force-pushed the lldb-cmake-sanitized-fix branch from 560b09b to 78379bd Compare January 15, 2026 19:23
@ndrewh ndrewh merged commit 34bc0a0 into llvm:main Jan 15, 2026
4 checks passed
ndrewh added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2026
…708)

To fix
https://green.lab.llvm.org/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake-sanitized/3582/

Match CMake flags to the existing clang jobs that bootstrap compiler-rt
successfully with LLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES

Follow-up to #707
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant