[server] Otel integration in server for HeartBeatStat Metrics

[m-nagarajan]

Problem Statement

Otel integration in server for HeartBeatStat Metrics

Solution

Current tehuti integration: using heart beat metrics as an example. There are 2 layers
Layer 1: metrics in HeartbeatStat class of different types (Rate(), Min(), Max(), etc) are created used local metrics repository, thus can't be exported. These are created for each version available
Layer 2: metrics in HeartbeatStatReporter class, all of which are AsyncGauge() which reads from the metrics in layer 1 for the current/future versions. These gets exported.

This brings in a complexity where 2 sets of metrics needs to be maintained and the 2nd layer should be always a Gauge leading to the metric name having _min/_min/_avg suffixes to note what its measuring, thus limiting what could be exported. Moving to OpenTelemetry, I want to remove this complexity and make it just a single layer and use a dimension to denote whether it belongs to current/future/backup versions and thus could export histograms directly. The new metrics are defined and directly recorded at HeartbeatVersionedStats class where the previous layer 1 metrics are recorded.

New Otel metric: venice.server.ingestion.replication.heartbeat.delay (Histogram)
New Dimensions:
venice.replica.type: leader/follower
venice.replica.state: ready_to_serve/catching_up
venice.version.role: current/future/backup

Code changes

• Added new code behind a config. If so list the config names and their default values in the PR description.
• Introduced new log lines.
  • Confirmed if logs need to be rate limited to avoid excessive logging.

Concurrency-Specific Checks

Both reviewer and PR author to verify

• Code has no race conditions or thread safety issues.
• Proper synchronization mechanisms (e.g., synchronized, RWLock) are used where needed.
• No blocking calls inside critical sections that could lead to deadlocks or performance degradation.
• Verified thread-safe collections are used (e.g., ConcurrentHashMap, CopyOnWriteArrayList).
• Validated proper exception handling in multi-threaded code to avoid silent thread termination.

How was this PR tested?

• New unit tests added.
• New integration tests added.
• Modified or extended existing tests.
• Verified backward compatibility (if applicable).

Does this PR introduce any user-facing or breaking changes?

• No. You can skip the rest of this section.
• Yes. Clearly explain the behavior change and its impact.

[sixpluszero]

overall looks good, thank you for putting up this PR. Left some comments for clarifications..

[lluwm]

Thanks @m-nagarajan for addressing my comments and it LGTM!

[sixpluszero]

Overall lgtm! thank you for the change.
only one small nit about sharing the enum, I feel like if it is a common one, maybe it should not in the stat package.