Skip to content

Conversation

@joostjager
Copy link
Contributor

Only run the full build matrix (Linux/Windows/macOS × stable/beta/MSRV) on pushes to main. PR and non-main push builds now only run Linux with the MSRV toolchain (1.75.0), which is the most important gate for catching issues.

Only run the full build matrix (Linux/Windows/macOS × stable/beta/MSRV)
on pushes to main. PR and non-main push builds now only run Linux with
the MSRV toolchain (1.75.0), which is the most important gate for
catching issues.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <[email protected]>
@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

ldk-reviews-bot commented Feb 11, 2026

👋 Thanks for assigning @TheBlueMatt as a reviewer!
I'll wait for their review and will help manage the review process.
Once they submit their review, I'll check if a second reviewer would be helpful.

@joostjager joostjager marked this pull request as ready for review February 11, 2026 13:40
matrix:
platform: [ self-hosted, windows-latest, macos-latest ]
toolchain: [ stable, beta, 1.75.0 ] # 1.75.0 is the MSRV for all crates
platform: >-
Copy link
Collaborator

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt Feb 11, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we just move the beta/macos/windows runs to a separate file? That way this stays readable and we can trivially swap it for nightly jobs if we still see backup.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would require duplicating the steps I think? Or extracting the steps in a reusable workflow file perhaps.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yea, we'd have to copy the steps, but they're basically all just file-download caching.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the current change better. Minimal and non-duplicative. But can do the copy.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay. I find it hard to parse but not worth arguing about.

@ldk-reviews-bot
Copy link

👋 The first review has been submitted!

Do you think this PR is ready for a second reviewer? If so, click here to assign a second reviewer.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.06%. Comparing base (caf0aac) to head (1685661).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4410      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.05%   86.06%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         156      156              
  Lines      103384   103384              
  Branches   103384   103384              
==========================================
+ Hits        88964    88975      +11     
+ Misses      11905    11897       -8     
+ Partials     2515     2512       -3     
Flag Coverage Δ
tests 86.06% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

matrix:
platform: [ self-hosted, windows-latest, macos-latest ]
toolchain: [ stable, beta, 1.75.0 ] # 1.75.0 is the MSRV for all crates
platform: >-
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay. I find it hard to parse but not worth arguing about.

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt merged commit 2647583 into lightningdevkit:main Feb 11, 2026
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants