-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 491
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
meta: update the link to the ML #1170
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
meta: update the link to the ML #1170
Conversation
07af5c8
to
c2f1603
Compare
c2f1603
to
b6318c6
Compare
This commit is updating the link to the ML and redirect users to delvingbitcoin forum. We started using the delvingbitcoin bitcoin until we decided to switch to another platform last year. See [1] for more details [1. ML Future discussion](https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lightning-dev/2023-December/004231.html) Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <[email protected]>
b6318c6
to
26439b2
Compare
Maybe we should discuss whether we're happy with delving, it doesn't really seem like people are really using it for lightning discussion. |
How are you evaluating this? Afaict the ML is even quieter than delving and I've been part of a few threads that are pretty big LN topics. |
I am proposing to discuss this in the summit in Tokyo, I still need to post the comment, but I am planning to bring up this |
I think the problem is not that delving Bitcoin is no thread about lightning, but if the delving is slowing down the contribution or if it is making confusing contribute Plus, we should also solve the problem of reviewing big PR, like offers it is quite messy on github, and ML could help here |
This commit is updating the link to the ML and
redirect users to delvingbitcoin forum.
We started using the delvingbitcoin bitcoin until we decided to switch to another platform last year. See [1] for more details
1. ML Future discussion