-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modifications to add use_smeared_gauge to InvertParam #1522
Open
cjmorningstar10
wants to merge
7
commits into
lattice:develop
Choose a base branch
from
cjmorningstar10:add_use_smeared_gauge
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
65e2a80
Modifications to add use_smeared_gauge to InvertParam
cjmorningstar10 064c3a9
Included modified solve.cpp file to remove bool use_smeared_gauge
cjmorningstar10 d53fcb6
Another missed file that changed: tests/staggered_eigensolve_test.cpp
cjmorningstar10 1324adb
Added use_smeared_gauge check in eigensolveQuda and eigensolve test.
cjmorningstar10 0b118fa
Merge branch 'lattice:develop' into add_use_smeared_gauge
cjmorningstar10 233f4e6
Removed use_smeared_gauge from QudaEigParam since only needed in Quda…
cjmorningstar10 4140eb6
Merge branch 'lattice:develop' into add_use_smeared_gauge
cjmorningstar10 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why the change to
QudaBoolean
frombool
? I intentionally usedbool
with this variable as we intend to deprecateQudaBoolean
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also I think with this addition of the
use_smeared_gauge
parameter toQudaInvertParm
theQudaEigParam
variant is never used now? Can we just delete it?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I used QudaBoolean because all the other boolean members did...it looked weird to see a difference. But bool is fine. The use_smeared_gauge is needed in the InvertParam because only that gets sent to the setDiracParam functions, where it is needed. It is ok to keep it in the EigParam too. I think I put in a check that these two bools have to be the same.