-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
vendor: bump runc/libcontainer to v1.2.1 #128276
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
This issue is currently awaiting triage. If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the The Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
@kolyshkin Are you ok with folks running Containerd 1.6/1.7 with older runc versions with 1.2.0 runc vendored into kubelet? ( Want to make sure we don't end up with something like opencontainers/runc#3849 ) |
As of now we're not aware of any issues similar to opencontainers/runc#3849. |
/retest /assign @mrunalp @derekwaynecarr @dchen1107 @SergeyKanzhelev |
/hold |
@samuelkarp mentioned offline there may be a bug with 1.2.0. @samuelkarp can you please link it here? |
@SergeyKanzhelev please see containerd/containerd#10877 and discussion on slack https://cloud-native.slack.com/archives/CGEQHPYF4/p1729607023643899 |
@dims I think it will be best to wait for containerd to confirm it is ok to update. It will be best to have reference in k/k matching the actual binary we are testing in e2e. Do you agree or I am missing something? |
@SergeyKanzhelev i agree with you! |
xref: opencontainers/runc#4475 |
For one thing, this release decouples device management from libcontainer/cgroups. You can see the result of this in a dropped cilium/ebpf dependency (which is only needed for device management). NOTE that due to an issue with go mod / go list, github.com/opencontainers/runc had to be added to hack/unwanted-dependencies.json under x/exp. This is bogus because opencontainers/runc does not use x/exp directly, only via cilium/ebpf dependency (which is not vendored here). Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <[email protected]>
@SergeyKanzhelev |
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 89b1d408879013871e3bb3612770e552200f7964
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: kolyshkin, liggitt, SergeyKanzhelev The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
I guess there is not much reason to hold - let's get more soak time by merging on weekend. /unhold |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
Bump runc/libcontainer to v1.2.0.
For one thing, this release decouples device management from libcontainer/cgroups. You can see the result of this in a dropped cilium/ebpf dependency (which is only needed for device management).
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Special notes for your reviewer:
I'm also including pkg/kubelet/userns/inuserns: use moby/sys/userns #128237 here; will rebase once it's merged.Rebased.It looks like a bug in
hack/lint-dependencies.sh
script -- it insistsgolang.org/x/exp
is a dependency ofgithub.com/opencontainers/runc
, while in fact it is only used bygithub.com/cilium/ebpf
which is being removed here. Because of this bug, I had to add opencontainers/runc to hack/unwanted-dependencies.json under x/exp.A new dependency golang.org/x/execabs is being removed in the next patch release (libct: rm x/sys/execabs usage opencontainers/runc#4465)The issue with containerd and userns in runc v1.2.0 is fixed in v1.2.1.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: