Release Training SDK 1.9.0

[andreyvelich]

Part of: #2169

I released kubeflow-training==1.9.0 SDK version: https://pypi.org/manage/project/kubeflow-training/release/1.9.0/

/assign @kubeflow/wg-training-leads @Electronic-Waste

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12878316716

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 12862562175:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	85
Relevant Lines:	85

---

💛 - Coveralls

[terrytangyuan]

Were you able to resolve https://peps.python.org/pep-0625/?

[tenzen-y]

So, your point is wondering if we should rename to "kubeflow_training" or "kubeflowtraining"?

[andreyvelich]

I think, it is fine to keep it for 1.9 SDK since in the Deprecation they say:

 Any source distributions already uploaded will remain in place as-is and do not need to be updated.

For the newer Kubeflow Trainer SDK, we will name it kubeflow.
Does it look good @tenzen-y @terrytangyuan ?

[tenzen-y]

SGTM

[terrytangyuan]

Sure

[tenzen-y]

/approve
/hold
for Yuan question.

[Electronic-Waste]

LGTM

[google-oss-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Electronic-Waste, tenzen-y

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [tenzen-y]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[andreyvelich]

/hold cancel

[terrytangyuan]

/lgtm