Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow to disable port on services. #141

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

guillomep
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

When using service as load balancer, if we setup ldap to be on secure port only we don't want to expose the insecure port. Currently there is no way to do that.

With this modification, users can enable or disable exposition of insecure or secure port on the service.

Default values keep the current behaviour.

Pre-submission checklist:

  • Did you explain what problem does this PR solve? Or what new features have been added?
  • Have you updated the readme?
  • Is this PR backward compatible? This is backward compatible

Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 10, 2024

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Mar 10, 2024
When using service as load balancer, if we setup ldap to be on secure
port only we don't want to expose the insecure port.
Currently there is no way to do that.

With this modification, users can enable or disable exposition of
insecure or secure port on the service.

Default values keep the current behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Guillaume Perrin <[email protected]>
@guillomep
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not stale

@stale stale bot closed this Mar 18, 2024
@guillomep
Copy link
Contributor Author

It was not stale

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant