Skip to content

Conversation

@johnlindquist
Copy link
Owner

@johnlindquist johnlindquist commented Jul 8, 2025

Summary

  • Remove unused BashToolInput import to fix linting warning
  • Replace as unknown as type assertion with inline type check using 'command' in payload.tool_input
  • Use inline type assertion as {command: string} for cleaner, more readable code

Test plan

  • Verified the fix resolves the TypeScript error shown in VS Code
  • Ran bun run lint to ensure no linting issues
  • Tests pass in CI (note: local tests fail due to Node/Bun runtime mismatch)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified internal handling of command extraction for improved maintainability. No visible changes to end-user experience.

- Remove unused BashToolInput import
- Use inline type assertion with property check to avoid "as unknown as" pattern
- Ensures type safety while maintaining readability

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The code updates simplify the type casting for the command property in the preToolUse function by replacing the imported BashToolInput type with a direct inline type. No changes were made to the logic or public interfaces.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
templates/hooks/index.ts Removed BashToolInput import; used inline type for command extraction in preToolUse.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

released

Poem

A hop and a skip, a type cast anew,
No more imports, just inline will do!
The code is now lighter, the logic the same,
A rabbit’s delight in this type-casting game.
🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@johnlindquist johnlindquist enabled auto-merge (squash) July 8, 2025 22:56
@johnlindquist johnlindquist merged commit 093a7d1 into main Jul 8, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
templates/hooks/index.ts (1)

31-34: Substring check is trivially bypassed—tighten the dangerous-command filter

Attackers can slip through with minor variations (rm -rf /, rm -rf / --no-preserve-root, path globs, etc.). A simple regex closes obvious holes:

-    if (command.includes('rm -rf /') || command.includes('rm -rf ~')) {
+    const dangerous = /\brm\s+-rf\s+([/~]|--no-preserve-root\b|\*)/;
+    if (dangerous.test(command)) {

Consider expanding the deny-list or integrating a proper shell-parser if security is critical.
[security]

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 982ed4b and d999623.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • templates/hooks/index.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`templates/**/*`: Hook templates must be stored in the 'templates/' directory and are copied to the user's '.claude/' directory during initialization.

templates/**/*: Hook templates must be stored in the 'templates/' directory and are copied to the user's '.claude/' directory during initialization.

📄 Source: CodeRabbit Inference Engine (CLAUDE.md)

List of files the instruction was applied to:

  • templates/hooks/index.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)
  • GitHub Check: test (windows-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: test (windows-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: test (macos-latest, 18)
  • GitHub Check: test (macos-latest, 20)
  • GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest, 20)

Comment on lines 26 to 28
if (payload.tool_name === 'Bash' && payload.tool_input && 'command' in payload.tool_input) {
const bashInput = payload.tool_input as BashToolInput
const command = bashInput.command
const command = (payload.tool_input as {command: string}).command
console.log(`🚀 Running command: ${command}`)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Prefer a type-guard to eliminate the unsafe cast

The direct assertion (payload.tool_input as {command: string}).command silently trusts the payload’s shape. A tiny, locally-scoped type-guard keeps the compiler on your side and avoids re-introducing the deprecated double-assertion pattern:

-type BashToolInput = {command: string}
-function isBashToolInput(input: unknown): input is BashToolInput {
-  return !!input && typeof (input as any).command === 'string'
-}
-
-if (payload.tool_name === 'Bash' && isBashToolInput(payload.tool_input)) {
-  const {command} = payload.tool_input
+type BashToolInput = {command: string}
+function isBashToolInput(input: unknown): input is BashToolInput {
+  return !!input && typeof (input as any).command === 'string'
+}
+
+if (payload.tool_name === 'Bash' && isBashToolInput(payload.tool_input)) {
+  const {command} = payload.tool_input
   console.log(`🚀 Running command: ${command}`)

This keeps the file self-contained (no additional import) while giving the compiler a real guard instead of a blind cast.

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In templates/hooks/index.ts around lines 26 to 28, replace the direct type
assertion of payload.tool_input with a locally defined type-guard function that
checks if tool_input has a command property of type string. Use this type-guard
to safely access the command property without casting, ensuring type safety and
avoiding deprecated double-assertion patterns.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 8, 2025

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.2.3 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants