Skip to content

Conversation

bnjmnt4n
Copy link
Member

Checklist

If applicable:

  • I have updated CHANGELOG.md
  • I have updated the documentation (README.md, docs/, demos/)
  • I have updated the config schema (cli/src/config-schema.json)
  • I have added/updated tests to cover my changes

@bnjmnt4n bnjmnt4n requested a review from a team as a code owner August 23, 2025 14:29
Copy link
Contributor

@ilyagr ilyagr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like an improvement to me as-is, but perhaps we can go even further (see my other comments)? I'm not aware of any serious options with dynamic completions, and I'd probably recommend most packagers use those.

All of my comments could also be left for a separate PR or a separate discussion, if you prefer.

@glehmann
Copy link
Contributor

glehmann commented Sep 3, 2025

The dynamic completion offers a much better experience to the jj users, so this PR is a nice enhancement!
IMO we should even show the command for the dynamic version by default for the shells that support it.

Copy link
Member

@martinvonz martinvonz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me as is.

@ilyagr
Copy link
Contributor

ilyagr commented Sep 3, 2025

Thanks for the ping, Gaetan!

@bnjmnt4n bnjmnt4n added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 3, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit ba889a7 Sep 3, 2025
29 checks passed
@bnjmnt4n bnjmnt4n deleted the bnjmnt4n/push-xvtzmktnzxyt branch September 3, 2025 17:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants