20230820 - bib

book.bib

@@ -111026,7 +111026,7 @@ @Article{Garb2005a
   pages    = {97--118},
   volume   = {25},
   abstract = {The controversy surrounding the Rorschach is updated, and an analysis of its dynamics is offered. Results on normative data and validity are reviewed, followed by a summary of, and rebuttal to, arguments made by Rorschach advocates. We argue that the current controversy can be traced, at least in part, to two unwarranted beliefs. First is the belief that informal impressions and popularity provide dependable evidence for evaluating validity. Second is the belief that Rorschach scores with low individual validity are likely to yield much higher levels of validity if they are interpreted in combination with each other, or with other sources of information, by experts. After presenting historical background information, we show how several arguments made recently in defense of the test reflect these two beliefs, even though they are contradicted by research findings. We conclude that a variety of other divisive conflicts in clinical psychology are related to the inappropriate weight placed on informal and unsystematic impressions relative to systematic research.},
-  doi      = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2004.09.002},
+  doi      = {10.1016/j.cpr.2004.09.002},
   keywords = {Assessment, Methodology, Judgment, Rorschach},
   url      = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735804001333},
 }
@@ -111059,6 +111059,32 @@ @Article{Kraemer2000
   venue    = {American Journal of Psychiatry},
 }
 
+@Article{AAA1998,
+  author  = {{Executive Board of the American Anthropological Association}},
+  journal = {American Anthropologist},
+  title   = {{AAA} Statement on Race},
+  year    = {1998},
+  number  = {3},
+  pages   = {712--713},
+  volume  = {100},
+  doi     = {10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.712},
+  eprint  = {https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.712},
+  url     = {https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.712
+https://americananthro.org/about/policies/statement-on-race/},
+}
+
+@Article{Sternberg2005,
+  author  = {Robert J. Sternberg and Elena L. Grigorenko and Kenneth K. Kidd},
+  journal = {American Psychologist},
+  title   = {Intelligence, race, and genetics},
+  year    = {2005},
+  issn    = {1935-990X},
+  number  = {1},
+  pages   = {46--59},
+  volume  = {60},
+  doi     = {10.1037/0003-066x.60.1.46},
+}
+
 @Comment{jabref-meta: databaseType:bibtex;}
 
 @Comment{jabref-meta: saveActions:enabled;

book.bib.sav

@@ -111033,8 +111033,12 @@ [email protected]},
 
 @Article{Kraemer2000,
   author   = {H. Kraemer and J. Yesavage and Joy Taylor and D. Kupfer},
+  journal  = {American Journal of Psychiatry},
   title    = {How can we learn about developmental processes from cross-sectional studies, or can we?},
   year     = {2000},
+  number   = {2},
+  pages    = {163--171},
+  volume   = {157},
   abstract = {OBJECTIVE
 Cross-sectional studies are often used in psychiatric research as a basis of longitudinal inferences about developmental or disease processes. While the limitations of such usage are often acknowledged, these are often understated. The authors describe how such inferences are often, and sometimes seriously, misleading.
 
@@ -111055,6 +111059,32 @@ The simple conclusion is that one must always use the results of cross-sectional
   venue    = {American Journal of Psychiatry},
 }
 
+@Article{AAA1998,
+  author  = {{Executive Board of the American Anthropological Association}},
+  journal = {American Anthropologist},
+  title   = {{AAA} Statement on Race},
+  year    = {1998},
+  number  = {3},
+  pages   = {712--713},
+  volume  = {100},
+  doi     = {https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.712},
+  eprint  = {https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.712},
+  url     = {https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.712
+https://americananthro.org/about/policies/statement-on-race/},
+}
+
+@Article{Sternberg2005,
+  author  = {Robert J. Sternberg and Elena L. Grigorenko and Kenneth K. Kidd},
+  journal = {American Psychologist},
+  title   = {Intelligence, race, and genetics},
+  year    = {2005},
+  issn    = {1935-990X},
+  number  = {1},
+  pages   = {46--59},
+  volume  = {60},
+  doi     = {10.1037/0003-066x.60.1.46},
+}
+
 @Comment{jabref-meta: databaseType:bibtex;}
 
 @Comment{jabref-meta: saveActions:enabled;