Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: de-scope the IPFS Project Roadmap for 2019 #21

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 3, 2019

Conversation

daviddias
Copy link
Member

@daviddias daviddias commented Jan 28, 2019

//cc @ipfs/wg-captains

@daviddias daviddias requested a review from a team January 28, 2019 09:44
@ghost ghost assigned daviddias Jan 28, 2019
@ghost ghost added the status/in-progress In progress label Jan 28, 2019
@ghost ghost assigned momack2 Jan 28, 2019

The primitives and the network are here. Now we need to create a great user experience for the DWeb by integrating it with the tools and types of services we use everyday.
- Website Hosting on IPFS becomes simple and easy with migration paths from common sources (e.g. migrate or mirror Github Pages to IPFS).
- The migration to Base32 CIDs is completed across all projects and IPFS Gateway.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is still important (and inflight) - does it fit into any of the other epics or another bucket of work?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch! I kept it on the Web Browsers Roadmap and I thought I moved it here to another of the Epics, but seems I missed it. I'll correct. Thank you!

README.md Outdated
The Dynamic Data & Capabilities WG is working full speed towards this. If you are passionate about building DApps and/or have field experience you would like to share, please come and participate in the [DDC Bi-weekly Sync](https://github.com/ipfs/dynamic-data-and-capabilities#bi-weekly-sync).

### 5. The IPFS Community gets together for the 1st [IPFS Conf](https://github.com/ipfs/conf)
### 4. The IPFS Community gets together for the 1st [IPFS Conf](https://github.com/ipfs/conf)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should probably cut this too.

Copy link
Member

@Stebalien Stebalien left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❤️

Copy link
Contributor

@hsanjuan hsanjuan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@lidel lidel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, small suggestion inline.

@@ -95,7 +90,7 @@ We've been working hard on improving and iterating on the IPFS Protocol to make
- Complete Specification of the Protocol
- Security Audits and Security Program
- Go and JS IPFS enable modern IPFS data formats ([UnixFSv2](https://github.com/ipfs/unixfs-v2), [CIDv1](https://github.com/ipld/cid), raw blocks) by default
- Bring js-ipfs and go-ipfs to v1.0.0
- The migration to Base32 CIDs is completed across all projects and IPFS Gateway.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❤️

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-Authored-By: daviddias <[email protected]>
@daviddias
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you all for your timely review ❤️

@daviddias daviddias merged commit 21ad269 into master Feb 3, 2019
@daviddias daviddias deleted the de-scoping-2019 branch February 3, 2019 11:18
@ghost ghost removed the status/in-progress In progress label Feb 3, 2019
@alanshaw
Copy link
Member

alanshaw commented Feb 4, 2019

👍 LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants