Note: for updates please also check the fork by the original PH-Tree developer.
The PH-Tree is an ordered index on an n-dimensional space (quad-/oct-/2^n-tree) where each dimension is (by default) indexed by a 64bit integer. The index order follows z-order / Morton order. The default implementation is effectively a 'map', i.e. each key is associated with at most one value. Keys are points or boxes in n-dimensional space.
Two strengths of PH-Trees are fast insert/removal operations and scalability with large datasets. It also provides fast window queries and k-nearest neighbor queries, and it scales well with higher dimensions. The default implementation is limited to 63 dimensions.
The API ist mostly analogous to STL's std::map
, see function descriptions for details.
Theoretical background is listed here.
More information about PH-Trees (including a Java implementation) is available here.
The PH-Tree Map supports out of the box five types:
PhTreeD
usesPhPointD
keys, which are vectors/points of 64 bitdouble
.PhTreeF
usesPhPointF
keys, which are vectors/points of 32 bitfloat
.PhTreeBoxD
usesPhBoxD
keys, which consist of twoPhPointD
that define an axis-aligned rectangle/box.PhTreeBoxF
usesPhBoxF
keys, which consist of twoPhPointF
that define an axis-aligned rectangle/box.PhTree
usesPhPoint
keys, which are vectors/points ofstd::int64
The PH-Tree MultiMap supports out of the box three types:
PhTreeMultiMapD
usesPhPointD
keys, which are vectors/points of 64 bitdouble
.PhTreeMultiMapBoxD
usesPhBoxD
keys, which consist of twoPhPointD
that define an axis-aligned rectangle/box.PhTreeMultiMap
usesPhPoint
keys, which are vectors/points ofstd::int64
Additional tree types can be defined easily analogous to the types above, please refer to the declaration of the tree
types for an example. Support for custom key classes (points and boxes) as well as custom coordinate mappings can be
implemented using custom Converter
classes, see below. The PhTreeMultiMap
is by default backed
by std::unordered_set
but this can be changed via a template parameter.
The PhTree
and PhTreeMultiMap
types are available from phtree.h
and phtree_multimap.h
.
class MyData { ... };
MyData my_data;
// Create a 3D point tree with floating point coordinates and a value type of `MyData`.
auto tree = PhTreeD<3, MyData>();
// Create coordinate
PhPointD<3> p{1.1, 1.0, 10.};
// Some operations
tree.emplace(p, my_data);
tree.emplace_hint(hint, p, my_data);
tree.insert(p, my_data);
tree[p] = my_data;
tree.count(p);
tree.find(p);
tree.erase(p);
tree.erase(iterator);
tree.size();
tree.empty();
tree.clear();
// Multi-map only
tree.relocate(p_old, p_new, value);
tree.estimate_count(query);
- For-each over all elements:
tree.fore_each(callback);
- Iterator over all elements:
auto iterator = tree.begin();
- For-each with box shaped window queries:
tree.fore_each(PhBoxD(min, max), callback);
- Iterator for box shaped window queries:
auto q = tree.begin_query(PhBoxD(min, max));
- Iterator for k nearest neighbor queries:
auto q = tree.begin_knn_query(k, center_point, distance_function);
- Custom query shapes, such as spheres:
tree.for_each(callback, FilterSphere(center, radius, tree.converter()));
// Callback for counting entries
struct Counter {
void operator()(PhPointD<3> key, T& t) {
++n_;
}
size_t n_ = 0;
};
// Count entries inside of an axis aligned box defined by the two points (1,1,1) and (3,3,3)
Counter callback;
tree.for_each({{1, 1, 1}, {3, 3, 3}}, callback);
// callback.n_ is now the number of entries in the box.
// Iterate over all entries
for (auto it : tree) {
...
}
// Iterate over all entries inside of an axis aligned box defined by the two points (1,1,1) and (3,3,3)
for (auto it = tree.begin_query({{1, 1, 1}, {3, 3, 3}}); it != tree.end(); ++it) {
...
}
// Find 5 nearest neighbors of (1,1,1)
for (auto it = tree.begin_knn_query(5, {1, 1, 1}); it != tree.end(); ++it) {
...
}
All queries allow specifying an additional filter. The filter is called for every key/value pair that would normally be
returned (subject to query constraints) and to every node in the tree that the query decides to traverse (also subject
to query constraints). Returning true
in the filter does not change query behaviour, returning false
means that the
current value or child node is not returned or traversed. An example of a geometric filter can be found
in phtree/common/filter.h
in FilterAABB
.
template <dimension_t DIM, typename T>
struct FilterByValueId {
[[nodiscard]] constexpr bool IsEntryValid(const PhPoint<DIM>& key, const T& value) const {
// Arbitrary example: Only allow values with even values of id_
return value.id_ % 2 == 0;
}
[[nodiscard]] constexpr bool IsNodeValid(const PhPoint<DIM>& prefix, int bits_to_ignore) const {
// Allow all nodes
return true;
}
};
// Iterate over all entries inside of an axis aligned box defined by the two points (1,1,1) and (3,3,3).
// Return only entries that suffice the filter condition.
for (auto it = tree.begin_query({1, 1, 1}, {3, 3, 3}, FilterByValueId<3, T>())); it != tree.end(); ++it) {
...
}
Nearest neighbor queries can also use custom distance metrics, such as L1 distance. Note that this returns a special iterator that provides a function to get the distance of the current entry:
#include "phtree/phtree.h"
// Find 5 nearest neighbors of (1,1,1) using L1 distance
for (auto it = tree.begin_knn_query(5, {1, 1, 1}, DistanceL1<3>())); it != tree.end(); ++it) {
std::cout << "distance = " << it.distance() << std::endl;
...
}
The PH-Tree can internally only process integer keys. In order to use floating point coordinates, the floating point
coordinates must be converted to integer coordinates. The PhTreeD
and PhTreeBoxD
use by default the
PreprocessIEEE
& PostProcessIEEE
functions. The IEEE
processor is a loss-less converter (in terms of numeric
precision) that simply takes the 64bits of a double value and treats them as if they were a 64bit integer
(it is slightly more complicated than that, see discussion in the papers referenced above). In other words, it treats
the IEEE 754 representation of the double value as integer, hence the name IEEE
converter.
The IEEE
conversion is fast and reversible without loss of precision. However, it has been shown that other converters
can result in indexes that are up to 20% faster. One useful alternative is a Multiply
converter that convert floating
point to integer by multiplication and casting:
double my_float = ...;
// Convert to int
std::int64_t my_int = (std::int64_t) my_float * 1000000.;
// Convert back
double resultung_float = ((double)my_int) / 1000000.;
It is obvious that this approach leads to a loss of numerical precision. Moreover, the loss of precision depends on the
actual range of the double values and the constant. The chosen constant should probably be as large as possible but
small enough such that converted values do not exceed the 64bit limit of std::int64_t
. Note that the PH-Tree provides
several ConverterMultiply
implementations for point/box and double/float.
template <dimension_t DIM>
struct MyConverterMultiply : public ConverterPointBase<DIM, double, scalar_64_t> {
explicit MyConverterMultiply(double multiplier)
: multiplier_{multiplier}, divider_{1. / multiplier} {}
[[nodiscard]] PhPoint<DIM> pre(const PhPointD<DIM>& point) const {
PhPoint<DIM> out;
for (dimension_t i = 0; i < DIM; ++i) {
out[i] = point[i] * multiplier_;
}
return out;
}
[[nodiscard]] PhPointD<DIM> post(const PhPoint<DIM>& in) const {
PhPointD<DIM> out;
for (dimension_t i = 0; i < DIM; ++i) {
out[i] = ((double)in[i]) * divider_;
}
return out;
}
[[nodiscard]] auto pre_query(const PhBoxD<DIM>& query_box) const {
return PhBox{pre(query_box.min()), pre(query_box.max())};
}
const double multiplier_;
const double divider_;
};
template <dimension_t DIM, typename T>
using MyTree = PhTreeD<DIM, T, MyConverterMultiply<DIM>>;
void test() {
MyConverterMultiply<3> converter{1000000};
MyTree<3, MyData> tree(converter);
... // use the tree
}
It is also worth trying out constants that are 1 or 2 orders of magnitude smaller or larger than this maximum value. Experience shows that this may affect query performance by up to 10%. This is due to a more compact structure of the resulting index tree.
With custom converters it is also possible to use your own custom classes as keys (instead of PhPointD
or PhBoxF
).
The following example defined custom MyPoint
and MyBox
types and a converter that allows using them with a PhTree
:
struct MyPoint {
double x_;
double y_;
double z_;
};
using MyBox = std::pair<MyPoint, MyPoint>;
class MyConverterMultiply : public ConverterBase<3, 3, double, scalar_64_t, MyPoint, MyBox> {
using BASE = ConverterPointBase<3, double, scalar_64_t>;
using PointInternal = typename BASE::KeyInternal;
using QueryBoxInternal = typename BASE::QueryBoxInternal;
public:
explicit MyConverterMultiply(double multiplier = 1000000)
: multiplier_{multiplier}, divider_{1. / multiplier} {}
[[nodiscard]] PointInternal pre(const MyPoint& point) const {
return {static_cast<long>(point.x_ * multiplier_),
static_cast<long>(point.y_ * multiplier_),
static_cast<long>(point.z_ * multiplier_)};
}
[[nodiscard]] MyPoint post(const PointInternal& in) const {
return {in[0] * divider_, in[1] * divider_, in[2] * divider_};
}
[[nodiscard]] QueryBoxInternal pre_query(const MyBox& box) const {
return {pre(box.first), pre(box.second)};
}
private:
const double multiplier_;
const double divider_;
};
void test() {
MyConverterMultiply tm;
PhTree<3, Id, MyConverterMultiply> tree(tm);
... // use the tree
}
- C++: Supports value types of
T
andT*
, but notT&
- C++: Return types of
find()
,emplace()
, ... differ slightly fromstd::map
, they have functionfirst()
,second()
instead of fields of the same name. - General: PH-Trees are maps, i.e. each coordinate can hold only one entry. In order to hold multiple values
per coordinate please use the
PhTreeMultiMap
implementations. - General: PH-Trees order entries internally in z-order (Morton order). However, the order is based on the ( unsigned) bit representation of keys, so negative coordinates are returned after positive coordinates.
- General: The current implementation support between 2 and 63 dimensions.
- Differences to std::map: There are several differences to
std::map
. Most notably for the iterators:begin()
/end()
are not comparable with<
or>
. Onlyit == tree.end()
andit != tree.end()
is supported.- Value of
end()
: The tree has no linear memory layout, so there is no useful definition of a pointer pointing _ after_ the last entry or any entry. This should be irrelevant for normal usage.
Problem: The PH-Tree appears to be losing updates/insertions.
Solution: Remember that the PH-Tree is a map, keys will not be inserted if an identical key already exists. The
easiest solution is to use one of the PhTreeMultiMap
implementations. Alternatively, this can be solved by turning the
PH-Tree into a multi-map, for example by using something like std::map
or std::set
as member type:
PhTree<3, std::set<MyDataClass>>
. The set
instances can then be used to handle key conflicts by storing multiple
entries for the same key. The logic to handle conflicts must currently be implemented manually by the user.
The PH-Tree is a multi-dimensional index or spatial index. This section gives a rough overview how the PH-Tree compares to other spatial indexes, such as kD-trees, R-trees/BV-hierarchies or quadtrees.
Disclaimer: This overview cannot be comprehensive (there are 100s of spatial indexes out there) and performance depends heavily on the actual dataset, usage patterns, hardware, ... .
Generally, the PH-Tree tends to have the following advantages:
-
Fast insertion/removal times. While some indexes, such as k-D-trees, trees can be build from scratch very fast, they tend to be be much slower when removing entries or when indexing large datasets. Also, most indexes require rebalancing which may result in unpredictable latency (R-trees) or may result in index degradation if delayed (kD-trees).
-
Competitive query performance. Query performance is generally comparable to other index structures. The PH-Tree is fast at looking up coordinates but requires more traversal than other indexes. This means it is especially efficient if the query results are 'small', e.g. up to 100 results per query.
-
Scalability with large datasets. The PH-Tree's insert/remove/query performance tends to scale well to large datasets with millions of entries.
-
Scalability with the number of dimensions. The PH-Tree has been shown to deal "well" with high dimensional data ( 1000k+ dimensions). What does "well" mean?
- It works very well for up to 30 (sometimes 50) dimensions. Please note that the C++ implementation has not been optimised nearly as much as the Java implementation.
- For more dimensions (Java was tested with 1000+ dimensions) the PH-Tree still has excellent insertion/deletion performance. However, the query performance cannot compete with specialised high-dim indexes such as cover-trees or pyramid-trees (these tend to be very slow on insertion/deletion though).
-
Modification operations (insert/delete) in a PH-Tree are guaranteed to modify only one Node (potentially creating/deleting a second one). This guarantee can have advantages for concurrent implementations or when serializing the index. Please note that this advantage is somewhat theoretical because this guarantee is not exploited by the current implementation (it doesn't support concurrency or serialization).
PH-Tree disadvantages:
-
A PH-Tree is a map, not a multi-map. This project also provides
PhTreeMultiMap
implementations that store a hash-set at each coordinate. In practice, the overhead of storing sets appears to be usually small enough to not matter much. -
PH-Trees are not very efficient in scenarios where queries tend to return large result sets in the order of 1000 or more.
There are numerous ways to improve performance. The following list gives an overview over the possibilities.
-
Use
for_each
instead of iterators. This should improve performance of queries by 5%-10%. -
Use
emplace_hint
if possible. When updating the position of an entry, the naive way is to useerase()
/emplace()
. Withemplace_hint
, insertion can avoid navigation to the target node if the insertion coordinate is close to the removal coordinate.auto iter = tree.find(old_position); tree.erase(iter); tree.emplace_hint(iter, new_position, value);
-
Store pointers instead of large data objects. For example, use
PhTree<3, MyLargeClass*>
instead ofPhTree<3, MyLargeClass>
ifMyLargeClass
is large.- This prevents the PH-Tree from storing the values inside the tree. This should improve cache-locality and thus performance when operating on the tree.
- Using pointers is also useful if construction/destruction of values is expensive. The reason is that the tree has to construct and destruct objects internally. This may be avoidable but is currently still happening.
-
Use non-box query shapes. Depending on the use case it may be more suitable to use a custom filter for queries. For example:
tree.for_each(callback, FilterSphere(center, radius, tree.converter()));
-
Use a different data converter. The default converter of the PH-Tree results in a reasonably fast index. Its biggest advantage is that it provides lossless conversion from floating point coordinates to PH-Tree coordinates (integers) and back to floating point coordinates.
-
The
ConverterMultiply
is a lossy converter but it tends to improve performance by 10% or more. This is not caused by faster operation in the converter itself but by a more compact tree shape. The example shows how to use a converter that multiplies coordinates by 100'000, thus preserving roughly 5 fractional digits:PhTreeD<DIM, T, ConverterMultiply<3, 100 * 1000, 1>>
-
-
Use custom key types. By default, the PH-Tree accepts only coordinates in the form of its own key types, such as
PhPointD
,PhBoxF
or similar. To avoid conversion from custom types to PH-Tree key types, custom classes can often be adapted to be accepted directly by the PH-Tree without conversion. This requires implementing a custom converter as described in the section about Custom Key Types. -
Advanced: Adapt internal Node representation. Depending on the dimensionality
DIM
, the PH-Tree uses internally inNodes
different container types to hold entries. By default, it uses an array forDIM<=3
, a vector forDIM<=8
and an ordered map forDIM>8
. Adapting these thresholds can have strong effects on performance as well as memory usage. One example: Changing the threshold to use vector forDIM==3
reduced performance of theupdate_d
benchmark by 40%-50% but improved performance ofquery_d
by 15%-20%. The threshold is currently hardcoded.
The effects are not always easy to predict but here are some guidelines:- "array" is the fastest solution for insert/update/remove type operations. Query performance is "ok". Memory consumption is O(DIM^2) for every node regardless of number of entries in the node.
- "vector" is the fastest for queries but has for large nodes worst case O(DIM^2) insert/update/remove performance.
- "map" scales well with
DIM
but is for low values ofDIM
generally slower than "array" or "vector".
This section will guide you through the initial build system and IDE you need to go through in order to build and run custom versions of the PH-Tree on your machine.
PH-Tree can be built with cmake 3.14 or Bazel as build system. All code is written in C++ targeting the C++17 standard. The code has been verified to compile on Linux with Clang 9, 10, 11, 12, and GCC 9, 10, 11, and on Windows with Visual Studio 2019.
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:hnakamur/libarchive
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:hnakamur/libzstd
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:hnakamur/cmake
sudo apt update
sudo apt install cmake
To build on Windows, you'll need to have a version of Visual Studio 2019 installed (likely Professional), in addition to Bazel or cmake.
Once you have set up your dependencies, you should be able to build the PH-Tree repository by running:
bazel build ...
Similarly, you can run all unit tests with:
bazel test ...
mkdir build
cd build
cmake ..
cmake --build .
./example/Example
The PH-Tree is discussed in the following publications and reports:
- T. Zaeschke, C. Zimmerli, M.C. Norrie: "The PH-Tree -- A Space-Efficient Storage Structure and Multi-Dimensional Index", (SIGMOD 2014)
- T. Zaeschke: "The PH-Tree Revisited", (2015)
- T. Zaeschke, M.C. Norrie: "Efficient Z-Ordered Traversal of Hypercube Indexes" (BTW 2017).