Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(release): publish v1.6.0 #584

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 9, 2024
Merged

chore(release): publish v1.6.0 #584

merged 7 commits into from
May 9, 2024

Conversation

MicaiahReid
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

rafaelcr and others added 7 commits May 8, 2024 10:12
Also separate `StacksPayload` and `BitcoinPayload` into separate types
for easier client-side inference.
Bump version to 1.8.0
When a Chainhook is triggered and we send a payload to a user, we filter
some values based on user settings (`include_proof`, `include_inputs`,
etc). This helps to reduce the payload size that is sent over the wire.

However, when we created this payload, we were omitting these fields
completely even though the corresponding type does not have those fields
as optional. This makes using our SDK types for deserialization
impossible.

This PR adds in those fields in all cases and sets them to empty values
if filtered out.
@MicaiahReid MicaiahReid merged commit 4a45617 into main May 9, 2024
5 checks passed
@MicaiahReid MicaiahReid had a problem deploying to Development-mainnet May 9, 2024 00:51 — with GitHub Actions Failure
@MicaiahReid MicaiahReid had a problem deploying to Development-testnet May 9, 2024 00:51 — with GitHub Actions Failure
@MicaiahReid MicaiahReid had a problem deploying to Development-mainnet May 9, 2024 00:52 — with GitHub Actions Failure
@MicaiahReid MicaiahReid had a problem deploying to Development-testnet May 9, 2024 00:52 — with GitHub Actions Failure
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 9, 2024

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.6.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants