[deps] Updated dependencies

[hawkkiller]

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

• New Features

  • Introduced a new event transformation mechanism with the BlocTransformer and SequentialBlocTransformer classes for improved event handling in the Flutter Bloc framework.

• Bug Fixes

  • Updated Flutter SDK version to ensure compatibility with the latest patches and features.

• Chores

  • Updated various dependencies in the pubspec.yaml file to their latest versions for better performance and security.
  • Adjusted configuration files to align with the new Flutter SDK version.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request includes updates to the Flutter version across multiple configuration files, changing it from 3.24.0 to 3.24.4. Additionally, it introduces a new abstract class BlocTransformer and its implementation SequentialBlocTransformer to enhance event transformation within the Flutter Bloc context. Other modifications involve dependency version updates in the pubspec.yaml file, ensuring compatibility with the latest versions of various packages.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.fvmrc	Updated Flutter version from "3.24.0" to "3.24.4".
.github/workflows/code-analysis.yml	Updated Flutter version in the workflow from flutter-version: 3.24.0 to flutter-version: 3.24.4.
.vscode/settings.json	Updated Flutter SDK path from .fvm/versions/3.24.0 to .fvm/versions/3.24.4.
lib/src/core/utils/bloc_transformer.dart	Added abstract class BlocTransformer and concrete class SequentialBlocTransformer with a transform method.
lib/src/feature/initialization/logic/app_runner.dart	Updated import and assignment for Bloc.transformer to use SequentialBlocTransformer().transform.
pubspec.yaml	Updated Flutter SDK version constraint and various dependency versions, including cupertino_http, drift, and others.

Possibly related PRs

• feat: Analytics reporter #376: The changes in the main PR involve updating the Flutter version in various files, while PR feat: Analytics reporter #376 introduces a new analytics reporter that may depend on the Flutter SDK, indicating a potential relationship in terms of compatibility with the updated Flutter version.

Poem

🐇 In fields of code, we hop and play,
With Flutter's patch, we greet the day.
A transformer new, to guide our streams,
In every line, we chase our dreams.
Dependencies dance in version's light,
Together we code, from morn till night! 🌼

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.65%. Comparing base (d953376) to head (ebcd46e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #380   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   54.65%   54.65%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         258      258           
=======================================
  Hits          141      141           
  Misses        117      117           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	54.65% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.