Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The abstract sockets are a Linux-specific feature. Should support for this also be Linux-specific? Is there any evidence of support for such unix-domain sockets on any of the BSDs, or other unix-like system?
[ By the way, it is rather unfortunate that the
path
associated with a unix-domain socketSockAddrUnix
is aString
and not aByteString
. Callinglength
here is only correct, because when binding the socket we later truncate all theChar
s toCChar
s. UsingByteString
here would have been a better interface. ]There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also at around line 1019, I don't see any effort to decode abstract socket addresses correctly. Is there a portable way to distinguish empty paths from abstract socket addresses? Presently it looks like they'll return an empty path from
accept()
,getsockname()
andgetpeername()
. If these are to be supported, surely not justconnect()
,sendto()
andbind()
should work, but alsoaccept()
,getsockname()
,getpeername
andrecvfrom()
for datagram sockets.