Skip to content

Update Rust crate ariadne to v0.5.1#6694

Merged
hash-worker[bot] merged 2 commits intomainfrom
deps/rs/ariadne-0.x
Mar 23, 2025
Merged

Update Rust crate ariadne to v0.5.1#6694
hash-worker[bot] merged 2 commits intomainfrom
deps/rs/ariadne-0.x

Conversation

@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Mar 14, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
ariadne workspace.dependencies patch =0.5.0 -> =0.5.1

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

zesterer/ariadne (ariadne)

v0.5.1

Added
  • impl Cache for &Source
  • Multiple and multiline help support

Changed

  • Use RPITIT instead of Box<dyn ...> for caches

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge March 14, 2025 00:25
@github-actions github-actions bot added the area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) label Mar 14, 2025
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Mar 14, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 14, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 20.54%. Comparing base (96f20bd) to head (01d948d).
Report is 60 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6694      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   20.76%   20.54%   -0.22%     
==========================================
  Files         558      559       +1     
  Lines       19424    19727     +303     
  Branches     2963     3042      +79     
==========================================
+ Hits         4033     4053      +20     
- Misses      15334    15617     +283     
  Partials       57       57              
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.32% <ø> (∅)
apps.hash-api 0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 38.75% <ø> (∅)
local.harpc-client 50.93% <ø> (∅)
local.hash-backend-utils 3.94% <ø> (∅)
local.hash-graph-sdk 0.00% <ø> (∅)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.00% <ø> (∅)
local.hash-subgraph 21.19% <ø> (∅)
rust.deer 6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 74.56% <ø> (+3.70%) ⬆️
rust.sarif 88.81% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot requested a review from a team March 14, 2025 00:52
@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann assigned indietyp and unassigned TimDiekmann Mar 14, 2025
@TimDiekmann TimDiekmann requested review from hashdotai and indietyp and removed request for a team March 14, 2025 11:40
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team labels Mar 22, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 213 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.469 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 221 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.345 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-28.550 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.518 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.667 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$17.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 236 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$17.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.59 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 238 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.26 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.95 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$4.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$3.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.444 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$2.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.251 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579 $$2.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.65 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.688 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$13.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 66.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.404 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$2.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.59 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.979 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.78 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.76 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.310 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$55.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 484 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.841 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$41.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 448 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.574 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$44.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 493 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.236 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$58.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 487 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$65.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 353 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.885 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$50.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 536 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.561 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$86.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 665 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.108 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$37.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 467 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.006 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$72.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 412 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$90.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 675 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.540 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$98.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 997 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.232 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$82.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 623 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.996 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 10 entities $$32.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-38.069 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$27.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.231 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$270 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.68 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.713 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$181 \mathrm{ms} \pm 760 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$20.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.742 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor Author

hash-worker bot commented Mar 22, 2025

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 23, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 4ded70f Mar 23, 2025
151 checks passed
@hash-worker hash-worker bot deleted the deps/rs/ariadne-0.x branch March 23, 2025 12:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants