-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 117
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adds more fields to connection stats #368
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM modulo the points below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the delay. Looks mostly good, left some thoughts. PTAL.
/** | ||
* Start time of the connection. | ||
*/ | ||
int64_t conn_start_at; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"conn_" seems excessive to me, as this field is part of quicly_conn_t
. Maybe rename to created_at
or something?
if (epoch == QUICLY_EPOCH_INITIAL || epoch == QUICLY_EPOCH_HANDSHAKE) | ||
++conn->super.stats.num_packets.handshake_received; | ||
if (epoch == QUICLY_EPOCH_0RTT) | ||
++conn->super.stats.num_packets.zerortt_received; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure if this is the correct location for updating the metrics.
We update num_packets.received
in quicly_accept
and quicly_receive
. Maybe we should change that to per-packet-type metric (i.e. uint64_t [QUICLY_NUM_EPOCHS]
) and increment the counter of the corresponding epoch.
@@ -1253,6 +1269,13 @@ static int record_receipt(quicly_conn_t *conn, struct st_quicly_pn_space_t *spac | |||
conn->egress.send_ack_at = conn->stash.now + QUICLY_DELAYED_ACK_TIMEOUT; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
if (is_ack_only) | |||
++conn->super.stats.num_packets.ack_only_received; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems fine.
if (get_epoch(*s->target.first_byte_at) == QUICLY_EPOCH_INITIAL || get_epoch(*s->target.first_byte_at) == QUICLY_EPOCH_HANDSHAKE) | ||
++conn->super.stats.num_packets.handshake_sent; | ||
if (get_epoch(*s->target.first_byte_at) == QUICLY_EPOCH_0RTT) | ||
++conn->super.stats.num_packets.zerortt_sent; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As stated above, maybe it would be better to change the type of num_packets.sent
to uint64_t [QUICLY_NUM_EPOCHS]
and increment the per-epoch counter.
@@ -3198,6 +3226,7 @@ int quicly_send_stream(quicly_stream_t *stream, quicly_send_context_t *s) | |||
UpdateState: | |||
QUICLY_PROBE(STREAM_SEND, stream->conn, stream->conn->stash.now, stream, off, end_off - off, is_fin); | |||
QUICLY_PROBE(QUICTRACE_SEND_STREAM, stream->conn, stream->conn->stash.now, stream, off, end_off - off, is_fin); | |||
stream->conn->super.stats.num_bytes.stream_sent += end_off - off; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This metric would cover both the ordinary streams and CRYPTO streams, as we do not check the sign of the stream-id. Are we fine with that? I do not have a strong opinion but would like to confirm.
@@ -4278,6 +4307,7 @@ static int handle_stream_frame(quicly_conn_t *conn, struct st_quicly_handle_payl | |||
if ((ret = quicly_decode_stream_frame(state->frame_type, &state->src, state->end, &frame)) != 0) | |||
return ret; | |||
QUICLY_PROBE(QUICTRACE_RECV_STREAM, conn, conn->stash.now, frame.stream_id, frame.offset, frame.data.len, (int)frame.is_fin); | |||
conn->super.stats.num_bytes.stream_received += frame.data.len; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Here also.
No description provided.