-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 544
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
r321: ruler: cap the number of remote eval retries #10390
Conversation
* ruler: cap the number of remote eval retries The retries happen more aggressively than actual evaluations. With the current setup an error spike results in 3x the query rate - initial query, and two retries fairly quickly 100ms & 200ms after that. This PR changes that so that the whole process doesn't retry more than a fixed number of queries/sec. I chose 170 because at GL the average evals/sec is 340 per ruler. This would retry about half of the rules on average. _On average_ that should increase query load by 50%. Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]> * Add CHANGELOG.md entry Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]> * Fix a totally arbitrary stupid linter rule Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]> * Use a CB instead of a rate limtier Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]> * Revert "Use a CB instead of a rate limtier" This reverts commit b07366f. * Don't abort retries if we're over the rate limit Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]> * Cancel reservation when context expires Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit ffee57d)
* [BUGFIX] Distributor: Use a boolean to track changes while merging the ReplicaDesc components, rather than comparing the objects directly. #10185 | ||
|
||
* [CHANGE] Ruler: cap the rate of retries for remote query evaluation to 170/sec. This is configurable via `-ruler.query-frontend.max-retries-rate`. #10375 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the changelog in r321 was messed up: it has entries from the 2.15-rc.0
above the "Grafana Mimir". Do you think we can fix that in this PR? 🙃
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not this pr but i can open another one
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🔥
#10375; also includes the fix from #10393
(cherry picked from commit ffee57d)