Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Updates to support public preview of Blooms in Cloud #15108

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

JStickler
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

Further tweaks to the Loki docs to support Public Preview of Bloom Filters before I mount files into the Cloud Docs.

  • Standardized the Warning on the two Blooms topics
  • Updated the prerequisites on the Query topic for Cloud Docs
  • While making these updates I realized that we never explicitly documented how to enable structured metadata, so added that too.

@JStickler JStickler added type/docs Issues related to technical documentation; the Docs Squad uses this label across many repositories backport release-3.3.x labels Nov 25, 2024
@JStickler JStickler requested a review from a team as a code owner November 25, 2024 19:09
@loki-gh-app
Copy link
Contributor

loki-gh-app bot commented Nov 25, 2024

This PR must be merged before a backport PR will be created.

1 similar comment
@loki-gh-app
Copy link
Contributor

loki-gh-app bot commented Nov 25, 2024

This PR must be merged before a backport PR will be created.

@JStickler JStickler merged commit 3da33cd into main Nov 25, 2024
65 checks passed
@JStickler JStickler deleted the 2024.11.25_blooms branch November 25, 2024 20:23
loki-gh-app bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport release-3.3.x size/S type/docs Issues related to technical documentation; the Docs Squad uses this label across many repositories
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants